Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zhuodi Hao
dblp:414/8802
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-9178-1457ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 65% Vision and language · 35% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational finance and economics · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval
retrieval-augmented generation |
1.3 | 2 | 2026 | NeocorRAG: Less Irrelevant Information, More Explicit Evidence, and More Effective Recall via Evidence Chains · WWW 2026 FinMMDocR: Benchmarking Financial Multimodal Reasoning with Scenario Awareness, Document Understanding, and Multi-Step Computation · AAAI 2026 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | FinMMDocR: Benchmarking Financial Multimodal Reasoning with Scenario Awareness, Document Understanding, and Multi-Step Computation · AAAI 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
financial multimodal reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | $\mathcal{F}_{M}$ FinMMR: Make Financial Numerical Reasoning More Multimodal, Comprehensive, and Challenging · ICCV 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
retrieval-augmented generation · 2.0multimodal learning · 1.7large language model · 1.7constrained decoding · 1.0activated search · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | FinMMDocR: Benchmarking Financial Multimodal Reasoning with Scenario Awareness, Document Understanding, and Multi-Step ComputationabstractWe introduce FinMMDocR, a novel bilingual multimodal benchmark for evaluating multimodal large language models (MLLMs) on real-world financial numerical reasoning. Compared to existing benchmarks, our work delivers three major advancements. (1) Scenario Awareness: 57.9% of 1,200 expert-annotated problems incorporate 12 types of implicit financial scenarios (e.g., Portfolio Management), challenging models to perform expert-level reasoning based on assumptions; (2) Document Understanding: 837 Chinese/English documents spanning 9 types (e.g., Company Research) average 50.8 pages with rich visual elements, significantly surpassing existing benchmarks in both breadth and depth of financial documents; (3) Multi-Step Computation: Problems demand 11-step reasoning on average (5.3 extraction + 5.7 calculation steps), with 65.0% requiring cross-page evidence (2.4 pages average). The best-performing MLLM achieves only 58.0% accuracy, and different retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods show significant performance variations on this task. We expect FinMMDocR to drive improvements in MLLMs and reasoning-enhanced methods on complex multimodal reasoning tasks in real-world scenarios. Zichen Tang, Haihong E, Rongjin Li, Linwei Jia, Zhuodi Hao, Zhongjun Yang, Yuanze Li, Haolin Tian, Peizhi Zhao, Xianghe Wang, Xueyuan Lin, Ruofei Bai, Zijian Xie, Ruining Cao, Haocheng Gao |
AAAI | 6 |
| 2026 | NeocorRAG: Less Irrelevant Information, More Explicit Evidence, and More Effective Recall via Evidence ChainsabstractAlthough precise recall is a core objective in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), a critical oversight persists in the field: improvements in retrieval performance do not consistently translate to commensurate gains in downstream reasoning. To diagnose this gap, we propose the Recall Conversion Rate (RCR), a novel evaluation metric to quantify the contribution of retrieval to reasoning accuracy. Our quantitative analysis of mainstream RAG methods reveals that as Recall@5 improves, the RCR exhibits a near-linear decay. We identify the neglect of retrieval quality in these methods as the underlying cause. In contrast, approaches that focus solely on quality optimization often suffer from inferior recall performance. Both categories lack a comprehensive understanding of retrieval quality optimization, resulting in a trade-off dilemma. To address these challenges, we propose comprehensive retrieval quality optimization criteria and introduce the NeocorRAG framework. This framework achieves holistic retrieval quality optimization by systematically mining and utilizing Evidence Chains. Specifically, NeocorRAG first employs an innovative activated search algorithm to obtain a refined candidate space. Then it ensures precise evidence chain generation through constrained decoding. Finally, the retrieved set of evidence chains guides the retrieval optimization process. Evaluated on benchmarks including HotpotQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA, MuSiQue, and NQ, NeocorRAG achieves SOTA performance on both 3B and 70B parameter models, while consuming less than 20% of tokens used by comparable methods. This study presents an efficient, training-free paradigm for RAG enhancement that effectively optimizes retrieval quality while maintaining high recall. Our code is released at https://github.com/BUPT-Reasoning-Lab/NeocorRAG. Shiyao Peng, Qianhe Zheng, Zhuodi Hao, Zichen Tang, Rongjin Li, Yifan Zhu 0001, Haihong E |
WWW | 3 |
| 2025 | $\mathcal{F}_{M}$ FinMMR: Make Financial Numerical Reasoning More Multimodal, Comprehensive, and Challenging
Zichen Tang, Haihong E, Zhongjun Yang, Rongjin Li, Zihua Rong, Haoyang He, Zhuodi Hao, Xinyang Hu, Kun Ji, Ziyan Ma, Mengyuan Ji, Chenghao Ma, Qianhe Zheng, Zijian Xie, Shiyao Peng |
ICCV | 8 |