Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shisi Guan

dblp:415/0725 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › optimization modeling
LLM-based optimization modeling
1.922026
DeepOR: A Deep Reasoning Foundation Model for Optimization Modeling · AAAI 2026
A Survey of Optimization Modeling Meets LLMs: Progress and Future Directions · IJCAI 2025
Mathematical optimization
optimization modeling
1.922026
DeepOR: A Deep Reasoning Foundation Model for Optimization Modeling · AAAI 2026
A Survey of Optimization Modeling Meets LLMs: Progress and Future Directions · IJCAI 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chain-of-thought reasoning
1.012026
DeepOR: A Deep Reasoning Foundation Model for Optimization Modeling · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
reasoning model
1.012026
DeepOR: A Deep Reasoning Foundation Model for Optimization Modeling · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

supervised fine-tuning · 2.0self-exploration · 2.0reward shaping · 2.0reinforcement learning · 2.0large language model · 0.9fine-tuning · 0.9data synthesis · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 DeepOR: A Deep Reasoning Foundation Model for Optimization Modeling
abstract
Optimization modeling plays a critical role in supporting optimal decision-making across various domains. Previous works have demonstrated that large language models (LLMs) tailored for optimization modeling have significantly automated and simplified this process. However, these models typically employ a straightforward input-output paradigm and struggle with challenging instances. In contrast, recent advances in general-purpose reasoning LLMs (RLLMs), such as DeepSeek-R1, have shown impressive capabilities in complex domains like mathematics and coding. In this paper, we introduce DeepOR, the first RLLM specifically designed for optimization modeling. Instead of directly outputting solutions, DeepOR explicitly performs multiple intermediate reasoning steps. To adapt a base LLM into an RLLM, we begin by synthesizing long chain-of-thought (CoT) data guided by a flowchart, which is automatically generated using a self-exploration algorithm. Once the training data are prepared, we employ supervised fine-tuning on the base LLM to endow it with reasoning capabilities tailored for optimization modeling. To fully leverage the model's reasoning potential, we further apply reinforcement learning with reward-shaping derived from solver feedback. Experimental results on benchmarks confirm that DeepOR consistently and significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art approaches.
Ziyang Xiao, Yuan Jessica Wang, Xiongwei Han, Shisi Guan, Jingyan Zhu, Jingrong Xie 0001, Lilin Xu, Han Wu 0004, Wing Yin Yu, Zehua Liu, Xiaojin Fu, Gang Chen 0001, Dongxiang Zhang
AAAI4
2025 A Survey of Optimization Modeling Meets LLMs: Progress and Future Directions
abstract
By virtue of its great utility in solving real-world problems, optimization modeling has been widely employed for optimal decision-making across various sectors, but it requires substantial expertise from operations research professionals. With the advent of large language models (LLMs), new opportunities have emerged to automate the procedure of mathematical modeling. This survey presents a comprehensive and timely review of recent advancements that cover the entire technical stack, including data synthesis and fine-tuning for the base model, inference frameworks, benchmark datasets, and performance evaluation. In addition, we conducted an in-depth analysis on the quality of benchmark datasets, which was found to have a surprisingly high error rate. We cleaned the datasets and constructed a new leaderboard with fair performance evaluation in terms of base LLM model and datasets. We also build an online portal that integrates resources of cleaned datasets, code and paper repository to benefit the community. Finally, we identify limitations in current methodologies and outline future research opportunities.
Ziyang Xiao, Jingrong Xie 0001, Lilin Xu, Shisi Guan, Jingyan Zhu, Xiongwei Han, Xiaojin Fu, WingYin Yu, Han Wu 0004, Qingcan Kang, Jiahui Duan, Tao Zhong 0004, Mingxuan Yuan, Yuan Wang 0003, Gang Chen 0001, Dongxiang Zhang
IJCAI4