Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Saar Tzour-Shaday

dblp:415/3038 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Efficient and distributed learning · 33%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program verification · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › neural network verification
local robustness verification
0.912025
Mini-Batch Robustness Verification of Deep Neural Networks · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.912025
Mini-Batch Robustness Verification of Deep Neural Networks · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025
Program verification
neural network verification
0.912025
Mini-Batch Robustness Verification of Deep Neural Networks · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mini-batch verification · 1.7adversarial robustness analysis · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Mini-Batch Robustness Verification of Deep Neural Networks
abstract
Neural network image classifiers are ubiquitous in many safety-critical applications. However, they are susceptible to adversarial attacks. To understand their robustness to attacks, many local robustness verifiers have been proposed to analyze ϵ -balls of inputs. Yet, existing verifiers introduce a long analysis time or lose too much precision, making them less effective for a large set of inputs. In this work, we propose a new approach to local robustness: group local robustness verification. The key idea is to leverage the similarity of the network computations of certain ϵ -balls to reduce the overall analysis time. We propose BaVerLy , a sound and complete verifier that boosts the local robustness verification of a set of ϵ -balls by dynamically constructing and verifying mini-batches. BaVerLy adaptively identifies successful mini-batch sizes, accordingly constructs mini-batches of ϵ -balls that have similar network computations, and verifies them jointly. If a mini-batch is verified, all its ϵ -balls are proven robust. Otherwise, one ϵ -ball is suspected as not being robust, guiding the refinement. BaVerLy leverages the analysis results to expedite the analysis of that ϵ -ball as well as the analysis of the mini-batch with the other ϵ -balls. We evaluate BaVerLy on fully connected and convolutional networks for MNIST and CIFAR-10. Results show that BaVerLy scales the common one by one verification by 2.3x on average and up to 4.1x, in which case it reduces the total analysis time from 24 hours to 6 hours.
Saar Tzour-Shaday, Dana Drachsler-Cohen
Proc. ACM Program. Lang.1