Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Saar Tzour-Shaday
dblp:415/3038
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Efficient and distributed learning · 33% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program verification · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › neural network verification
local robustness verification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mini-Batch Robustness Verification of Deep Neural Networks · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mini-Batch Robustness Verification of Deep Neural Networks · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Program verification
neural network verification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mini-Batch Robustness Verification of Deep Neural Networks · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mini-batch verification · 1.7adversarial robustness analysis · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mini-Batch Robustness Verification of Deep Neural NetworksabstractNeural network image classifiers are ubiquitous in many safety-critical applications. However, they are susceptible to adversarial attacks. To understand their robustness to attacks, many local robustness verifiers have been proposed to analyze ϵ -balls of inputs. Yet, existing verifiers introduce a long analysis time or lose too much precision, making them less effective for a large set of inputs. In this work, we propose a new approach to local robustness: group local robustness verification. The key idea is to leverage the similarity of the network computations of certain ϵ -balls to reduce the overall analysis time. We propose BaVerLy , a sound and complete verifier that boosts the local robustness verification of a set of ϵ -balls by dynamically constructing and verifying mini-batches. BaVerLy adaptively identifies successful mini-batch sizes, accordingly constructs mini-batches of ϵ -balls that have similar network computations, and verifies them jointly. If a mini-batch is verified, all its ϵ -balls are proven robust. Otherwise, one ϵ -ball is suspected as not being robust, guiding the refinement. BaVerLy leverages the analysis results to expedite the analysis of that ϵ -ball as well as the analysis of the mini-batch with the other ϵ -balls. We evaluate BaVerLy on fully connected and convolutional networks for MNIST and CIFAR-10. Results show that BaVerLy scales the common one by one verification by 2.3x on average and up to 4.1x, in which case it reduces the total analysis time from 24 hours to 6 hours. Saar Tzour-Shaday, Dana Drachsler-Cohen |
Proc. ACM Program. Lang. | 1 |