Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hui-Yu Zhou

dblp:415/3941 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain adaptation
0.912025
AdaGen: Adaptive Domain-Specific Classification via Zero-Shot Dataset Generation · ICDM 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
zero-shot learning
0.912025
AdaGen: Adaptive Domain-Specific Classification via Zero-Shot Dataset Generation · ICDM 2025
Recommender systems › set recommendation
bundle recommendation
0.912025
Preference Identification by Interaction Overlap for Bundle Recommendation · IJCAI 2025
Recommender systems › user modeling
user preference modeling
0.312025
Preference Identification by Interaction Overlap for Bundle Recommendation · IJCAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user interest boundary loss · 0.9prompt engineering · 0.9dual prompt framework · 0.9autoencoder · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Large interest network for click-through rate prediction
Hui-Yu Zhou, Chang-Dong Wang 0001, Pei-Yuan Lai
Neural Networks2
2025 AdaGen: Adaptive Domain-Specific Classification via Zero-Shot Dataset Generation
abstract
Recent advances in pre-trained language models (PLMs), such as GPT, BERT, and their larger variants, have significantly enhanced the ability to generate synthetic datasets for zero-shot learning, where models can generate data without the need for human annotations. However, existing methods often focus on generating domain-specific datasets, which restricts their generalization capabilities when applied to new, unseen domains. Furthermore, many of these methods rely on a single, static dataset that is either too broad or too narrowly tailored to a specific domain, making them less adaptable to diverse downstream domains. In this paper, we propose a dual prompt data generation framework, called Adaptive Domain-Specific Classification via Zero-shot Dataset Generation (AdaGen), which decouples universal representation learning from domain-specific adaptation. The framework consists of two components: domainagnostic training set generation via a universal prompt, followed by domain-specific validation set generation for weight learning. By combining these two components, our method achieves an optimal trade-off between cross-domain robustness and domainspecific accuracy, allowing a small task-aware model to effectively adapt across diverse domains while preserving generalization. This novel method overcomes the limitations of traditional methods by introducing dynamic feedback, enabling efficient zeroshot learning with improved adaptability. Extensive experiments in seven real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of AdaGen, which outperforms the compared baseline models.
Zhan-Hao Xu, Fei-Yao Liang, Hui-Yu Zhou, Chang-Dong Wang 0001
ICDM3
2025 Preference Identification by Interaction Overlap for Bundle Recommendation
abstract
In the digital age, recommendation systems are crucial for enhancing user experiences, with bundle recommendations playing a key role by integrating complementary products. However, existing methods fail to accurately identify user preferences for specific items within bundles, making it difficult to design bundles containing more items of interest to users. Additionally, these methods do not leverage similar preferences among users of the same category, resulting in unstable and incomplete preference expressions. To address these issues, we propose Preference Identification by Interaction Overlap for Bundle Recommendation (PIIO). The data augmentation module analyzes the overlap between bundle-item inclusions and user-item interactions to calculate the interaction probability of non-interacted bundles, selecting the bundle with the highest probability as a positive sample to enrich user-bundle interactions and uncover user preferences for items within bundles. The preference aggregation module utilizes the overlap in user-item interactions to select similar users, aggregates preferences using an autoencoder, and constructs comprehensive preference profiles. The optimization module predicts user-bundle matching scores based on a user interest boundary loss function. The proposed PIIO model is applied to two bundle recommendation datasets, and experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the PIIO model, surpassing state-of-the-art models.
Fei-Yao Liang, Wudong Xi, Xing-Xing Xing, Chang-Dong Wang 0001, Hui-Yu Zhou
IJCAI6