Yanwanyu Xi

dblp:415/4141 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-6884-2825ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 78% Trustworthy machine learning · 22%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 87% Data integration and cleaning · 13%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
1.922026
Contrastive and Dual Adversarial Representation Learning for Multi-View Clustering · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2026
LRGR: Self-Supervised Incomplete Multi-View Clustering via Local Refinement and Global Realignment · IJCAI 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training
1.012026
Contrastive and Dual Adversarial Representation Learning for Multi-View Clustering · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2026
Data mining
clustering
1.012026
Contrastive and Dual Adversarial Representation Learning for Multi-View Clustering · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2026
Data mining › clustering
multi-view clustering
1.012026
Contrastive and Dual Adversarial Representation Learning for Multi-View Clustering · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2026
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › multi-view learning › multi-view clustering
incomplete multi-view clustering
0.912025
LRGR: Self-Supervised Incomplete Multi-View Clustering via Local Refinement and Global Realignment · IJCAI 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
multi-view contrastive learning
0.912025
LRGR: Self-Supervised Incomplete Multi-View Clustering via Local Refinement and Global Realignment · IJCAI 2025
Data integration and cleaning › missing data
missing value imputation
0.312026
Contrastive and Dual Adversarial Representation Learning for Multi-View Clustering · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

contrastive learning · 2.9autoencoder · 2.0adversarial learning · 2.0pseudo-labeling · 0.9graph convolutional network · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Contrastive and Dual Adversarial Representation Learning for Multi-View Clustering
abstract
Multi-View Clustering (MVC) has gained increasing attention due to its ability to effectively leverage the complementary information of multi-view data. Despite the success of existing MVC methods in many real-world applications, they often overlook the discrepancy of view-specific latent distribution and struggle to ensure the completeness of the multi-view data. To address these challenges and harness the powerful feature extraction capability of deep networks, we propose a novel Contrastive and Dual Adversarial Representation Learning method for Multi-view Clustering, termed as CDARL, to solve multi-view clustering problems with both complete and incomplete multi-view data. Specifically, CDARL employs alternating adversarial and contrastive learning to align the view-specific representations, driving them into the same semantic latent space to minimize the discrepancy in view-specific distributions. In addition, a consensus latent representation is learned by an adaptive fusion block that integrates information from multiple views. The consensus representation is further refined through adversarial learning modeling the transformation of the standard Gaussian distribution to the original data distribution. Moreover, the proposed method incorporates an imputation strategy designed to handle the incomplete multi-view data clustering task. This strategy utilizes both reconstructed samples and cross-view neighbors to impute missing views from the latent space and the original space, thereby preserving clustering information, which ensures the quality and feasibility of the imputed samples. Experimental results on six widely used datasets have verified the competitiveness of the proposed CDARL method against state-of-the-art methods in MVC problems with complete and incomplete multi-view data. Code is available athttps://github.com/xywy220/CDARL-MVC.
Yanwanyu Xi, Chang Tang, Junjie Huang 0001, Xingchen Hu 0001, Yuanyuan Liu 0004, Xinwang Liu 0002
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.1
2025 LRGR: Self-Supervised Incomplete Multi-View Clustering via Local Refinement and Global Realignment
abstract
Incomplete Multi-View Clustering (IMVC) aims to explore comprehensive representations from multiple views with missing samples. Recent studies have revealed that IMVC methods benefit from Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) in achieving robust feature imputation and effective representation learning. Despite these notable improvements, GCN imputation methods often cause a distribution shift between the imputed and original representations, particularly when the neighbors of the imputed nodes are assigned to different groups. Moreover, GCN learning methods tend to produce homogeneous imputed representations, which blur cluster boundaries and hinder effective discriminative clustering. To remedy these challenges, the Local Refinement and Global Realignment (LRGR) Self-supervised model is proposed for incomplete multi-view clustering, which includes two stages. In the first stage, a local imputed refinement module is designed to enhance the versatility of imputed representations through cross-view contrastive learning guided by view-specific prototypes. In the second stage, a global realignment module is introduced to achieve semantic consistency across views, alleviating distribution shifts by leveraging pseudo-labels and their corresponding confidence scores as guidance. Experiments on five widely used multi-view datasets demonstrate the competitiveness and superiority of our method compared to state-of-the-art approaches.
Yanwanyu Xi, Chang Tang, Xingchen Hu 0001, Yuanyuan Liu 0004, Xinwang Liu 0002
IJCAI1