Hangfei Ma

dblp:415/4319 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Vision and language · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
learning with noisy labels
0.912025
Screening, Rectifying, and Re-Screening: A Unified Framework for Tuning Vision-Language Models with Noisy Labels · IJCAI 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.912025
Screening, Rectifying, and Re-Screening: A Unified Framework for Tuning Vision-Language Models with Noisy Labels · IJCAI 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model › vision-language model adaptation
vision-language model fine-tuning
0.912025
Screening, Rectifying, and Re-Screening: A Unified Framework for Tuning Vision-Language Models with Noisy Labels · IJCAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pseudo-labeling · 0.9dual-level semantic matching · 0.9cross-validation · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Screening, Rectifying, and Re-Screening: A Unified Framework for Tuning Vision-Language Models with Noisy Labels
abstract
Pre-trained vision-language models have shown remarkable potential for downstream tasks. However, their fine-tuning under noisy labels remains an open problem due to challenges like self-confirmation bias and the limitations of conventional small-loss criteria. In this paper, we propose a unified framework to address these issues, consisting of three key steps: Screening, Rectifying, and Re-Screening. First, a dual-level semantic matching mechanism is introduced to categorize samples into clean, ambiguous, and noisy samples by leveraging both macro-level and micro-level textual prompts. Second, we design tailored pseudo-labeling strategies to rectify noisy and ambiguous labels, enabling their effective incorporation into the training process. Finally, a re-screening step, utilizing cross-validation with an auxiliary vision-language model, mitigates self-confirmation bias and enhances the robustness of the framework. Extensive experiments across ten datasets demonstrate that the proposed method significantly outperforms existing approaches for tuning vision-language pre-trained models with noisy labels.
Chaowei Fang, Hangfei Ma, De Cheng, Yue Zhang 0025, Guanbin Li
IJCAI2