VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Keon-Woo Roh
dblp:415/4805
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 77% Trustworthy machine learning · 23% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
open-domain question answering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | XLQA: A Benchmark for Locale-Aware Multilingual Open-Domain Question Answering · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
question answering evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | XLQA: A Benchmark for Locale-Aware Multilingual Open-Domain Question Answering · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › bias in language models
cultural bias in language models |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | XLQA: A Benchmark for Locale-Aware Multilingual Open-Domain Question Answering · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | XLQA: A Benchmark for Locale-Aware Multilingual Open-Domain Question Answering · EMNLP 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model evaluation · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | XLQA: A Benchmark for Locale-Aware Multilingual Open-Domain Question AnsweringabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) have shown significant progress in Open-Domain Question Answering (ODQA), yet most evaluations focus on English and assume locale-invariant answers across languages.This assumption neglects the cultural and regional variations that affect question understanding and answer, leading to biased evaluation in multilingual benchmarks.To address these limitations, we introduce XLQA, a novel benchmark explicitly designed for locale-sensitive multilingual ODQA.XLQA contains 3,000 English seed questions expanded to eight languages, with careful filtering for semantic consistency and human-verified annotations distinguishing locale-invariant and locale-sensitive cases.Our evaluation of five state-of-the-art multilingual LLMs reveals notable failures on localesensitive questions, exposing gaps between English and other languages due to a lack of locale-grounding knowledge.We provide a systematic framework and scalable methodology for assessing multilingual QA under diverse cultural contexts, offering a critical resource to advance the real-world applicability of multilingual ODQA systems.Our findings suggest that disparities in training data distribution contribute to differences in both linguistic competence and locale-awareness across models. Keon-Woo Roh, Yeong-Joon Ju, Seong-Whan Lee |
EMNLP | 1 |