Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Keon-Woo Roh

dblp:415/4805 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Question answering and dialogue systems · 77% Trustworthy machine learning · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
open-domain question answering
0.912025
XLQA: A Benchmark for Locale-Aware Multilingual Open-Domain Question Answering · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
question answering evaluation
0.912025
XLQA: A Benchmark for Locale-Aware Multilingual Open-Domain Question Answering · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › bias in language models
cultural bias in language models
0.312025
XLQA: A Benchmark for Locale-Aware Multilingual Open-Domain Question Answering · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.312025
XLQA: A Benchmark for Locale-Aware Multilingual Open-Domain Question Answering · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model evaluation · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 XLQA: A Benchmark for Locale-Aware Multilingual Open-Domain Question Answering
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown significant progress in Open-Domain Question Answering (ODQA), yet most evaluations focus on English and assume locale-invariant answers across languages.This assumption neglects the cultural and regional variations that affect question understanding and answer, leading to biased evaluation in multilingual benchmarks.To address these limitations, we introduce XLQA, a novel benchmark explicitly designed for locale-sensitive multilingual ODQA.XLQA contains 3,000 English seed questions expanded to eight languages, with careful filtering for semantic consistency and human-verified annotations distinguishing locale-invariant and locale-sensitive cases.Our evaluation of five state-of-the-art multilingual LLMs reveals notable failures on localesensitive questions, exposing gaps between English and other languages due to a lack of locale-grounding knowledge.We provide a systematic framework and scalable methodology for assessing multilingual QA under diverse cultural contexts, offering a critical resource to advance the real-world applicability of multilingual ODQA systems.Our findings suggest that disparities in training data distribution contribute to differences in both linguistic competence and locale-awareness across models.
Keon-Woo Roh, Yeong-Joon Ju, Seong-Whan Lee
EMNLP1