Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexandre Guimarães de Almeida Barros

dblp:415/6480 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Medical and health informatics › clinical text processing
clinical language model evaluation
0.912025
Evaluation of Medical Large Language Models: Taxonomy, Review, and Directions · IJCAI 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › pre-trained language model › biomedical language model
medical large language model
0.312025
Evaluation of Medical Large Language Models: Taxonomy, Review, and Directions · IJCAI 2025
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Evaluation of Medical Large Language Models: Taxonomy, Review, and Directions
abstract
The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into medicine presents both great opportunities and significant challenges, particularly in ensuring these models are accurate, reliable, and safe. While LLMs have shown impressive capabilities in understanding and generating human language, their application in the medical domain requires careful evaluation due to the critical nature of medical applications which are inherently linked to patient life and health. Current evaluations of LLMs in medicine are often fragmented and insufficient, with a lack of standardized performance metrics, limited use of real patient data, and insufficient attention to important applications, such as documentation, education, and research. Furthermore, traditional NLP-based evaluations are often inadequate for assessing the text generated by LLMs. Therefore, a robust evaluation is essential to ensure the responsible and effective use of LLMs in medical settings, and to address the inherent challenges associated with their implementation. This paper explores the various dimensions of LLM evaluation in the medical domain, proposes a new taxonomy for categorizing medical applications, and discusses directions for future research in this critical area.
Anísio Lacerda, Gisele L. Pappa, Adriano C. M. Pereira, Wagner Meira Jr., Alexandre Guimarães de Almeida Barros
IJCAI5