Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alexandre Guimarães de Almeida Barros
dblp:415/6480
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Medical and health informatics › clinical text processing
clinical language model evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Evaluation of Medical Large Language Models: Taxonomy, Review, and Directions · IJCAI 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › pre-trained language model › biomedical language model
medical large language model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Evaluation of Medical Large Language Models: Taxonomy, Review, and Directions · IJCAI 2025 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Evaluation of Medical Large Language Models: Taxonomy, Review, and DirectionsabstractThe integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into medicine presents both great opportunities and significant challenges, particularly in ensuring these models are accurate, reliable, and safe. While LLMs have shown impressive capabilities in understanding and generating human language, their application in the medical domain requires careful evaluation due to the critical nature of medical applications which are inherently linked to patient life and health. Current evaluations of LLMs in medicine are often fragmented and insufficient, with a lack of standardized performance metrics, limited use of real patient data, and insufficient attention to important applications, such as documentation, education, and research. Furthermore, traditional NLP-based evaluations are often inadequate for assessing the text generated by LLMs. Therefore, a robust evaluation is essential to ensure the responsible and effective use of LLMs in medical settings, and to address the inherent challenges associated with their implementation. This paper explores the various dimensions of LLM evaluation in the medical domain, proposes a new taxonomy for categorizing medical applications, and discusses directions for future research in this critical area. Anísio Lacerda, Gisele L. Pappa, Adriano C. M. Pereira, Wagner Meira Jr., Alexandre Guimarães de Almeida Barros |
IJCAI | 5 |