Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Franz Kaschner

dblp:416/5824 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot navigation and mapping · 56% Autonomous driving · 22% 3D vision · 22%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
ego-motion estimation
0.912025
Ground-Aware Automotive Radar Odometry · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
localization
0.912025
Ground-Aware Automotive Radar Odometry · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization
odometry
0.912025
Ground-Aware Automotive Radar Odometry · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception
0.912025
Ground-Aware Automotive Radar Odometry · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization › odometry
radar odometry
0.312025
Ground-Aware Automotive Radar Odometry · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
sensor fusion
0.312025
Ground-Aware Automotive Radar Odometry · ICRA 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ground plane extraction · 0.9factor graph optimization · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Ground-Aware Automotive Radar Odometry
abstract
Odometry is crucial for the navigation of autonomous vehicles in unknown environments. While cameras and LiDARs are commonly used to estimate the ego-motion of a vehicle, these sensors face limitations under bad lighting and severe weather conditions. Automotive radars overcome these challenges, but radar point clouds are generally sparse and noisy, making it difficult to identify useful features within a radar scan. In this paper, we address the problem of ego-motion estimation using a single automotive radar sensor. We propose a simple, yet effective, heuristic-based method to extract the ground plane from single radar scans and perform ground plane matching between consecutive scans. Additionally, we perform a windowed factor-graph optimization of the poses together with the ground plane, improving the accuracy of the pose estimation. We put our work to the test using the 4DRadarDataset. Our findings illustrate the state-of-the-art performance of our odometry approach compared to existing alternatives that use radar point clouds.
Daniel Casado Herraez, Franz Kaschner, Matthias Zeller, Dominik Muhle, Jens Behley, Michael Heidingsfeld, Daniel Cremers, Cyrill Stachniss
ICRA2