Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jeongwoo Na
dblp:417/3717
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 67% Recommender systems · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › reranking
LLM-based reranking |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Multi-view-guided Passage Reranking with Large Language Models · EMNLP 2025 |
Recommender systems
multi-view representation learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Multi-view-guided Passage Reranking with Large Language Models · EMNLP 2025 |
Information retrieval › reranking
passage reranking |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Multi-view-guided Passage Reranking with Large Language Models · EMNLP 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
orthogonal loss · 0.9non-generative encoding · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Multi-view-guided Passage Reranking with Large Language ModelsabstractRecent advances in large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance in passage reranking tasks.Despite their success, LLM-based methods still face challenges in efficiency and sensitivity to external biases.(i) Existing models rely mostly on autoregressive generation and sliding window strategies to rank passages, which incurs heavy computational overhead as the number of passages increases.(ii) External biases, such as position or selection bias, hinder the model's ability to accurately represent passages and the inputorder sensitivity.To address these limitations, we introduce a novel passage reranking model, called Multi-View-guided Passage Reranking (MVP).MVP is a non-generative LLM-based reranking method that encodes query-passage information into diverse view embeddings without being influenced by external biases.For each view, it combines query-aware passage embeddings to produce a distinct anchor vector, used to directly compute relevance scores in a single decoding step.Besides, it employs an orthogonal loss to make the views more distinctive.Extensive experiments demonstrate that MVP, with just 220M parameters, matches the performance of much larger 7B-scale finetuned models while achieving a 100× reduction in inference latency.Notably, the 3B-parameter variant of MVP achieves state-of-the-art performance on both in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks.The source code is available at https://github.com/bulbna/MVP. Jeongwoo Na, Jun Kwon, Eunseong Choi, Jongwuk Lee |
EMNLP | 1 |