VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bastien Dubail
dblp:417/3892
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 50% Representation and self-supervised learning · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
goal-conditioned reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Shift Before You Learn: Enabling Low-Rank Representations in Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › subspace learning
low-rank representation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Shift Before You Learn: Enabling Low-Rank Representations in Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spectral recoverability analysis · 0.9Type II Poincaré inequalities · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Shift Before You Learn: Enabling Low-Rank Representations in Reinforcement LearningabstractLow-rank structure is a common implicit assumption in many modern reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms. For instance, reward-free and goal-conditioned RL methods often presume that the successor measure admits a low-rank representation. In this work, we challenge this assumption by first remarking that the successor measure itself is not approximately low-rank. Instead, we demonstrate that a low-rank structure naturally emerges in the shifted successor measure, which captures the system dynamics after bypassing a few initial transitions. We provide finite-sample performance guarantees for the entry-wise estimation of a low-rank approximation of the shifted successor measure from sampled entries. Our analysis reveals that both the approximation and estimation errors are primarily governed by a newly introduced quantitity: the spectral recoverability of the corresponding matrix. To bound this parameter, we derive a new class of functional inequalities for Markov chains that we call Type II Poincaré inequalities and from which we can quantify the amount of shift needed for effective low-rank approximation and estimation. This analysis shows in particular that the required shift depends on decay of the high-order singular values of the shifted successor measure and is hence typically small in practice. Additionally, we establish a connection between the necessary shift and the local mixing properties of the underlying dynamical system, which provides a natural way of selecting the shift. Finally, we validate our theoretical findings with experiments, and demonstrate that shifting the successor measure indeed leads to improved performance in goal-conditioned RL. Bastien Dubail, Stefan Stojanovic, Alexandre Proutière |
NeurIPS | 1 |