Tianrui Lv

dblp:417/3926 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Question answering and dialogue systems · 65% Language models and text generation · 22% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 6%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
knowledge base question answering
1.012026
RFKG-CoT: Relation-Driven Adaptive Hop-count Selection and Few-Shot Path Guidance for Knowledge-Aware QA · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
knowledge-intensive question answering
1.012026
RFKG-CoT: Relation-Driven Adaptive Hop-count Selection and Few-Shot Path Guidance for Knowledge-Aware QA · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
multi-hop reasoning
1.012026
RFKG-CoT: Relation-Driven Adaptive Hop-count Selection and Few-Shot Path Guidance for Knowledge-Aware QA · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation
1.012026
RFKG-CoT: Relation-Driven Adaptive Hop-count Selection and Few-Shot Path Guidance for Knowledge-Aware QA · AAAI 2026
Information retrieval › document retrieval › domain-specific retrieval › legal information retrieval
legal case retrieval
1.012026
GLIER: Generative Legal Inference and Evidence Ranking for Legal Case Retrieval · ACL (1) 2026
Information retrieval
ranking
1.012026
GLIER: Generative Legal Inference and Evidence Ranking for Legal Case Retrieval · ACL (1) 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge graph
0.312026
RFKG-CoT: Relation-Driven Adaptive Hop-count Selection and Few-Shot Path Guidance for Knowledge-Aware QA · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling › sequence generation
sequence-to-sequence generation
0.312026
GLIER: Generative Legal Inference and Evidence Ranking for Legal Case Retrieval · ACL (1) 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-view evidence fusion · 2.0generative inference · 2.0large language model · 1.0in-context learning · 1.0chain-of-thought prompting · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 RFKG-CoT: Relation-Driven Adaptive Hop-count Selection and Few-Shot Path Guidance for Knowledge-Aware QA
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) often generate hallucinations in knowledge-intensive QA due to parametric knowledge limitations. While existing methods like KG-CoT improve reliability by integrating knowledge graph (KG) paths, they suffer from rigid hop-count selection (solely question-driven) and underutilization of reasoning paths (lack of guidance). To address this, we propose RFKG-CoT: First, it replaces the rigid hop-count selector with a relation-driven adaptive hop-count selector that dynamically adjusts reasoning steps by activating KG relations (e.g., 1-hop for direct ''brother" relations, 2-hop for indirect ''father-son" chains), formalized via a relation mask. Second, it introduces a few-shot in-context learning path guidance mechanism with CoT (think) that constructs examples in a ''question-paths-answer" format to enhance LLMs' ability to understand reasoning paths. Experiments on four KGQA benchmarks show RFKG-CoT improves accuracy by up to 14.7 pp (Llama2-7B on WebQSP) over KG-CoT. Ablations confirm the hop-count selector and the path prompt are complementary, jointly transforming KG evidence into more faithful answers.
Minghan Li 0003, Tianrui Lv, Guodong Zhou 0001
AAAI3
2026 GLIER: Generative Legal Inference and Evidence Ranking for Legal Case Retrieval
abstract
The semantic gap between colloquial user queries and professional legal documents presents a fundamental challenge in Legal Case Retrieval (LCR).Existing dense retrieval methods typically treat LCR as a black-box semantic matching process, neglecting the explicit juridical logic that underpins legal relevance.To address this, we propose GLIER (Generative Legal Inference and Evidence Ranking), a framework that reformulates retrieval as an inference process over latent legal variables.GLIER decomposes the task into two interpretability-driven stages: (1) A Joint Generative Inference module that translates raw queries into latent legal indicators (Charges and Legal Elements), employing a unified sequenceto-sequence strategy where charges and elements are generated jointly to enforce logical consistency; and (2) A Multi-View Evidence Fusion mechanism that aggregates generative confidence with structural and lexical signals for precise ranking.Extensive experiments on LeCaRD and LeCaRDv2 demonstrate that GLIER outperforms strong baselines like SAILER and KELLER.Notably, our framework exhibits exceptional data efficiency, maintaining robust performance even when trained with only 10% of the data. * Equal contribution.† Corresponding author.Code is available at https://github.com/SUGAR-NLP/ GLIER.(Query)On November 17, 2016, at 9 PM... due to a dispute over someone else's matter, he had an argument with Shao Huapeng over the phone.Shao Huapeng arranged to fight him at Zhaoh Bridge, but he did not go to the agreed location.Shao Huapeng
Minghan Li 0003, Tianrui Lv, Guodong Zhou 0001
ACL (1)2