VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Togbe Agbagla
dblp:417/3970
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 67% Spatial and temporal data management · 33% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Environmental and earth informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning and data management
active learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Mapping on a Budget: Optimizing Spatial Data Collection for ML · AAAI 2026 |
Spatial and temporal data management
spatial sampling |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Mapping on a Budget: Optimizing Spatial Data Collection for ML · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning and data management › training data management
training data collection |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Mapping on a Budget: Optimizing Spatial Data Collection for ML · AAAI 2026 |
Environmental and earth informatics
remote sensing |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Mapping on a Budget: Optimizing Spatial Data Collection for ML · AAAI 2026 |
Environmental and earth informatics › remote sensing
satellite imagery |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Mapping on a Budget: Optimizing Spatial Data Collection for ML · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
optimization · 2.0budget-constrained sampling · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Mapping on a Budget: Optimizing Spatial Data Collection for MLabstractIn applications across agriculture, ecology, and human development, machine learning with satellite imagery (SatML) is limited by the sparsity of labeled training data. While satellite data cover the globe, labeled training datasets for SatML are often small, spatially clustered, and collected for other purposes (e.g., administrative surveys or field measurements). Despite the pervasiveness of this issue in practice, past SatML research has largely focused on new model architectures and training algorithms to handle scarce training data, rather than modeling data conditions directly. This leaves scientists and policymakers who wish to use SatML for large-scale monitoring uncertain about whether and how to collect additional data to maximize performance. Here, we present the first problem formulation for the optimization of spatial training data in the presence of heterogeneous data collection costs and realistic budget constraints, as well as novel methods for addressing this problem. In experiments simulating different problem settings across three continents and four tasks, our strategies reveal substantial gains from sample optimization. Further experiments delineate settings for which optimized sampling is particularly effective. The problem formulation and methods we introduce are designed to generalize across application domains for SatML; we put special emphasis on a specific problem setting where our coauthors can immediately use our findings to augment clustered agricultural surveys for SatML monitoring in Togo. Livia Betti, Farooq Sanni, Gnouyaro Sogoyou, Togbe Agbagla, Cullen Molitor, Tamma Carleton, Esther Rolf |
AAAI | 4 |