Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zhongzheng Mu

dblp:417/5871 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0009-4352-1555ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 50% Program analysis · 50%
Network and information security
1 paper
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program analysis › program representation
abstract syntax tree analysis
0.912025
I Know Who Clones Your Code: Interpretable Smart Contract Similarity Detection · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2025
Software maintenance and evolution
code clone detection
0.912025
I Know Who Clones Your Code: Interpretable Smart Contract Similarity Detection · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2025
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security
smart contract
0.312025
I Know Who Clones Your Code: Interpretable Smart Contract Similarity Detection · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

cosine-wise diffusion · 1.7classifier hyperparameter search · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 I Know Who Clones Your Code: Interpretable Smart Contract Similarity Detection
abstract
Widespread reuse of open-source code in smart contract development boosts programming efficiency but significantly amplifies bug propagation across contracts, while dedicated methods for detecting similar smart contract functions remain very limited. Conventional abstract-syntax-tree (AST) based methods for smart contract similarity detection face challenges in handling intricate tree structures, which impedes detailed semantic comparison of code. Recent deep-learning based approaches tend to overlook code syntax and detection interpretability, resulting in suboptimal performance. To fill this research gap, we introduceSmartDetector, a novel approach for computing similarity between smart contract functions, explainable at the fine-grained statement level. Technically,SmartDetectordecomposes the AST of a smart contract function into a series of smaller statement trees, each reflecting a structural element of the source code. Then,SmartDetectoruses a classifier to compute the similarity score of two functions by comparing each pair of their statement trees. To address the infinite hyperparameter space of the classifier, we mathematically derive a cosine-wise diffusion process to efficiently search optimal hyperparameters. Extensive experiments conducted on three large real-world datasets demonstrate thatSmartDetectoroutperforms current state-of-the-art methods by an average improvement of 14.01% in F1-score, achieving an overall average F1-score of 95.88%.
Zhenguang Liu, Lixun Ma, Zhongzheng Mu, Chengkun Wei, Yingying Jiao, Kui Ren 0001
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput.3