VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Feiyue Xue
dblp:417/7427
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
7since 2021 · last 2027
0009-0007-0949-2987ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 33% Vision and language · 33% Question answering and dialogue systems · 17% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Chinese Two-part Allegorical Sayings Reading Comprehension: Exploration from Reasoning to Metaphor · AAAI 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
machine reading comprehension |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Chinese Two-part Allegorical Sayings Reading Comprehension: Exploration from Reasoning to Metaphor · AAAI 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › natural language semantics › figurative language processing
metaphor understanding |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Chinese Two-part Allegorical Sayings Reading Comprehension: Exploration from Reasoning to Metaphor · AAAI 2026 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal reasoning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | MePe: Rethinking Multimodal Chinese Idiom Reading Comprehension from a Metaphorical Perspective · WWW 2026 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal understanding |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | MePe: Rethinking Multimodal Chinese Idiom Reading Comprehension from a Metaphorical Perspective · WWW 2026 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
multi-view contrastive learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Chinese Two-part Allegorical Sayings Reading Comprehension: Exploration from Reasoning to Metaphor · AAAI 2026 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › affective computing › sentiment analysis
multimodal sentiment analysis |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Beyond Words: Enhancing Desire, Emotion, and Sentiment Recognition with Non-Verbal Cues · WWW 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reproducing kernel hilbert space · 1.0mixture of experts · 1.0maximum mean discrepancy · 1.0cross-projection · 1.0contrastive learning · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | DFM-NC: Disentangling fine-grained multiplex non-literal cues for multimodal sentiment analysis
Tongguan Wang, Feiyue Xue, Junkai Li, Xiqiao Ba, Yang Xiao 0018, Ying Sha |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 3 |
| 2027 | SIPTrack: Reliability-aware identity prediction for sparse-interval pig multi-object tracking with a new benchmark
Feiyue Xue, Wangjun Huang, Junkai Li, Tongguan Wang, Huaiping Jin, Ying Sha |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 1 |
| 2026 | Chinese Two-part Allegorical Sayings Reading Comprehension: Exploration from Reasoning to MetaphorabstractThe Two-Part Allegorical Saying (TPAS) is a Chinese linguistic phenomenon with a riddle-explanation structure, and an important component of Chinese metaphors. Existing research has primarily used TPAS to assist other semantic tasks, but lacks in-depth exploration of its intrinsic mechanisms: semantic rhetoric, logical reasoning, and metaphorical expression. To address this gap, we construct the first Chinese TPAS Reading Comprehension dataset (CTRC), which contains 18,103 TPASs and 75,296 passages. We frame it as a cloze test where the model selects the most suitable TPAS from candidates to fill passage blanks. To tackle the challenges of this CTRC task, we propose a Multi-view TPAS Contrastive Learning Network (MTCLN). Firstly, the joint vector cross-projection module extracts the rhetorical features of TPAS, such as homophonic puns, through vector space mapping to mitigate the semantic deviations caused by rhetoric. Then, the softened contrastive learning module strengthens the modeling of TPAS logical reasoning through feature association. Finally, the multi-view feature fusion module integrates contextual semantics with diverse TPAS features to facilitate the understanding of metaphorical expressions. Experiments on the CTRC dataset demonstrate that MTCLN achieves an average accuracy of 67.47%, outperforming large language models by 25.48%. Dongyu Su, Yimin Xiao, Tongguan Wang, Feiyue Xue, Junkai Li, Ying Sha |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2026 | Beyond Words: Enhancing Desire, Emotion, and Sentiment Recognition with Non-Verbal Cues
Tongguan Wang, Feiyue Xue, Junkai Li, Ying Sha |
WWW | 3 |
| 2026 | MePe: Rethinking Multimodal Chinese Idiom Reading Comprehension from a Metaphorical PerspectiveabstractThe multimodal Chinese idiom reading comprehension task aims to select the most appropriate idiom from a candidate list via the given text and image. This poses a significant challenge for the model to comprehend each Chinese idiom accurately. Existing multimodal Chinese idiom reading comprehension methods primarily focus on aligning contextual text and images, while overlooking two key attributes of Chinese idioms.(1) There is a discrepancy between the literal and metaphorical meanings of Chinese idioms. (2) The same Chinese idiom has different meanings in different scenarios, which requires targeted understanding by experts who specialize in different fields. To address the above challenges, we rethink the solution to the multimodal idiom reading comprehension task from a metaphorical perspective and propose a framework named MePe. Firstly, we propose a literal metaphorical semantic graph that systematically transforms the implicit discrepancy between the literal and metaphorical meanings of Chinese idioms into structured explicit relationships, thereby making metaphorical meanings more understandable. Then, we propose a mixture of idiom experts consisting of a literal idiom expert and a metaphorical idiom expert. Through division of labor and collaboration among these experts, we achieve an understanding of the dual meanings of Chinese idioms across different scenarios. Finally, we employ the maximum mean discrepancy to adjust the variance between the literal and metaphorical semantic features of Chinese idioms. By mapping these features onto a shared reproducing kernel Hilbert space, the model can better distinguish between the two based on contextual clues. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MePe achieves state-of-the-art performance on the MChIRC dataset. Tongguan Wang, Junkai Li, Feiyue Xue, Dongyu Su, Wangjun Huang, Ying Sha |
WWW | 3 |
| 2026 | SCA-Net: Semantic text-enhanced context-aware multimodal framework for fish feeding assessment in aquaculture
Junkai Li, Feiyue Xue, Tongguan Wang, Chunfang Wang, Zongyao Sha, Ying Sha |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 2 |
| 2026 | BIG-TM: Bridging Individual Guidance with Trifusion MoPoE for Chinese memes understanding
Tongguan Wang, Junkai Li, Feiyue Xue, Dongyu Su, Guixin Su, Xiaopeng Wen, Ying Sha |
Knowl. Based Syst. | 3 |