VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Qiaolin Wang
dblp:417/7481
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Speech recognition and synthesis · 50% Information extraction and text analysis · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
linguistic probing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Layer-wise Minimal Pair Probing Reveals Contextual Grammatical-Conceptual Hierarchy in Speech Representations · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
speech representation analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Layer-wise Minimal Pair Probing Reveals Contextual Grammatical-Conceptual Hierarchy in Speech Representations · EMNLP 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
minimal pair probing · 0.9layer-wise analysis · 0.9diagnostic feature analysis · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Layer-wise Minimal Pair Probing Reveals Contextual Grammatical-Conceptual Hierarchy in Speech RepresentationsabstractTransformer-based speech language models (SLMs) have significantly improved neural speech recognition and understanding.While existing research has examined how well SLMs encode shallow acoustic and phonetic features, the extent to which SLMs encode nuanced syntactic and conceptual features remains unclear.By drawing parallels with linguistic competence assessments for large language models, this study is the first to systematically evaluate the presence of contextual syntactic and semantic features across SLMs for self-supervised learning (S3M), automatic speech recognition (ASR), speech compression (codec), and as the encoder for auditory large language models (AudioLLMs).Through minimal pair designs and diagnostic feature analysis across 71 tasks spanning diverse linguistic levels, our layer-wise and time-resolved analysis uncovers that 1) all speech encode grammatical features more robustly than conceptual ones.2) Despite never seeing text, S3M match or surpass ASR encoders on every linguistic level, demonstrating that rich grammatical and even conceptual knowledge can arise purely from audio.3) S3M representations peak mid-network and then crash in the final layers, whereas ASR and AudioLLM encoders maintain or improve, reflecting how pre-training objectives reshape late-layer content.4) Temporal probing further shows that S3Ms encode grammatical cues 500 ms before a word begins, whereas AudioLLMs distribute evidence more evenly-indicating that objectives shape not only where but also when linguistic information is most salient.Together, these findings establish the first largescale map of contextual syntax and semantics in speech models and highlight both the promise and the limits of current SLM training paradigms. * Equal contribution. Linyang He, Qiaolin Wang, Xilin Jiang, Nima Mesgarani |
EMNLP | 2 |