Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jayanth Krishna Chundru

dblp:417/8987 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0006-4477-7040ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 44% Information extraction and text analysis · 44% Trustworthy machine learning · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic role labeling
frame identification
0.912025
Do LLMs Encode Frame Semantics? Evidence from Frame Identification · EMNLP 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation
frame semantics
0.912025
Do LLMs Encode Frame Semantics? Evidence from Frame Identification · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › language model interpretability
language model probing
0.312025
Do LLMs Encode Frame Semantics? Evidence from Frame Identification · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

prompt-based inference · 0.9fine-tuning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Do LLMs Encode Frame Semantics? Evidence from Frame Identification
abstract
We investigate whether large language models encode latent knowledge of frame semantics, focusing on frame identification, a core challenge in frame semantic parsing that involves selecting the appropriate semantic frame for a target word in context.Using the FrameNet lexical resource, we evaluate models under prompt-based inference and observe that they can perform frame identification effectively even without explicit supervision.To assess the impact of task-specific training, we fine-tune the model on FrameNet data, which substantially improves in-domain accuracy while generalizing well to out-of-domain benchmarks.Further analysis shows that the models can generate semantically coherent frame definitions, highlighting the model's internalized understanding of frame semantics.
Jayanth Krishna Chundru, Rudrashis Poddar, Jie Cao 0010, Tianyu Jiang 0001
EMNLP1