Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Laetitia Frost

dblp:418/1212 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 50% Optimization for machine learning · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › sparse learning
group sparsity
0.912025
Differentiable Sparsity via $D$-Gating: Simple and Versatile Structured Penalization · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
neural network compression
0.912025
Differentiable Sparsity via $D$-Gating: Simple and Versatile Structured Penalization · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › regularized risk minimization
nonsmooth regularization
0.912025
Differentiable Sparsity via $D$-Gating: Simple and Versatile Structured Penalization · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › sparsity
structured sparsity
0.912025
Differentiable Sparsity via $D$-Gating: Simple and Versatile Structured Penalization · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic gradient descent · 0.9gradient flow analysis · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Differentiable Sparsity via $D$-Gating: Simple and Versatile Structured Penalization
abstract
Structured sparsity regularization offers a principled way to compact neural networks, but its non-differentiability breaks compatibility with conventional stochastic gradient descent and requires either specialized optimizers or additional post-hoc pruning without formal guarantees. In this work, we propose $D$-Gating, a fully differentiable structured overparameterization that splits each group of weights into a primary weight vector and multiple scalar gating factors. We prove that any local minimum under $D$-Gating is also a local minimum using non-smooth structured $L_{2,2/D}$ penalization, and further show that the $D$-Gating objective converges at least exponentially fast to the $L_{2,2/D}$–regularized loss in the gradient flow limit. Together, our results show that $D$-Gating is theoretically equivalent to solving the original group sparsity problem, yet induces distinct learning dynamics that evolve from a non-sparse regime into sparse optimization. We validate our theory across vision, language, and tabular tasks, where $D$-Gating consistently delivers strong performance–sparsity tradeoffs and outperforms both direct optimization of structured penalties and conventional pruning baselines.
Chris Kolb, Laetitia Frost, Bernd Bischl, David Rügamer
NeurIPS2