Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Ethan Y. Chang

dblp:419/5711 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
fairness evaluation
0.912025
VMDT: Decoding the Trustworthiness of Video Foundation Models · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › hallucination
hallucination evaluation
0.912025
VMDT: Decoding the Trustworthiness of Video Foundation Models · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy
privacy evaluation
0.912025
VMDT: Decoding the Trustworthiness of Video Foundation Models · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
safety evaluation
0.912025
VMDT: Decoding the Trustworthiness of Video Foundation Models · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › model robustness evaluation
adversarial robustness evaluation
0.312025
VMDT: Decoding the Trustworthiness of Video Foundation Models · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model evaluation · 0.9benchmark construction · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 VMDT: Decoding the Trustworthiness of Video Foundation Models
abstract
As foundation models become more sophisticated, ensuring their trustworthiness becomes increasingly critical; yet, unlike text and image, the video modality still lacks comprehensive trustworthiness benchmarks. We introduce VMDT (Video-Modal DecodingTrust), the first unified platform for evaluating text-to-video (T2V) and video-to-text (V2T) models across five key trustworthiness dimensions: safety, hallucination, fairness, privacy, and adversarial robustness. Through our extensive evaluation of 7 T2V models and 19 V2T models using VMDT, we uncover several significant insights. For instance, all open-source T2V models evaluated fail to recognize harmful queries and often generate harmful videos, while exhibiting higher levels of unfairness compared to image modality models. In V2T models, unfairness and privacy risks rise with scale, whereas hallucination and adversarial robustness improve---though overall performance remains low. Uniquely, safety shows no correlation with model size, implying that factors other than scale govern current safety levels. Our findings highlight the urgent need for developing more robust and trustworthy video foundation models, and VMDT provides a systematic framework for measuring and tracking progress toward this goal. The code is available at https://sunblaze-ucb.github.io/VMDT-page/.
Yujin Potter, Zhun Wang, Nicholas Crispino, Kyle Montgomery, Alexander Xiong, Ethan Y. Chang, Francesco Pinto, Rahul Gupta 0001, Morteza Ziyadi, Christos Christodoulopoulos 0001, Bo Li 0026, Chenguang Wang 0001, Dawn Song
NeurIPS6