Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sayoko Moroi
dblp:419/7096
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | The Boundaries of Fair AI in Medical Image Prognosis: A Causal Perspective · NeurIPS 2025 |
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging
medical image analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | The Boundaries of Fair AI in Medical Image Prognosis: A Causal Perspective · NeurIPS 2025 |
Medical and health informatics › clinical prediction
time-to-event prediction |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | The Boundaries of Fair AI in Medical Image Prognosis: A Causal Perspective · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
survival analysis · 1.7causal analysis · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | The Boundaries of Fair AI in Medical Image Prognosis: A Causal PerspectiveabstractAs machine learning (ML) algorithms are increasingly used in medical image analysis, concerns have emerged about their potential biases against certain social groups. Although many approaches have been proposed to ensure the fairness of ML models, most existing works focus only on medical image diagnosis tasks, such as image classification and segmentation, and overlooked prognosis scenarios, which involve predicting the likely outcome or progression of a medical condition over time. To address this gap, we introduce FairTTE, the first comprehensive framework for assessing fairness in time-to-event (TTE) prediction in medical imaging. FairTTE encompasses a diverse range of imaging modalities and TTE outcomes, integrating cutting-edge TTE prediction and fairness algorithms to enable systematic and fine-grained analysis of fairness in medical image prognosis. Leveraging causal analysis techniques, FairTTE uncovers and quantifies distinct sources of bias embedded within medical imaging datasets. Our large-scale evaluation reveals that bias is pervasive across different imaging modalities and that current fairness methods offer limited mitigation. We further demonstrate a strong association between underlying bias sources and model disparities, emphasizing the need for holistic approaches that target all forms of bias. Notably, we find that fairness becomes increasingly difficult to maintain under distribution shifts, underscoring the limitations of existing solutions and the pressing need for more robust, equitable prognostic models. Thai-Hoang Pham, Jiayuan Chen 0003, Seungyeon Lee 0002, Yuanlong Wang 0004, Sayoko Moroi, Xueru Zhang, Ping Zhang 0016 |
NeurIPS | 5 |