Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nathan Craddock

dblp:419/9485 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Internet architecture and protocols · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet architecture and protocols
domain name system
0.912025
Modeling DNS Queries and Caching to Evaluate the Merits of QNAME Minimization · ICNP 2025
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving data analysis
0.912025
Modeling DNS Queries and Caching to Evaluate the Merits of QNAME Minimization · ICNP 2025
Internet architecture and protocols › domain name system
DNS caching
0.312025
Modeling DNS Queries and Caching to Evaluate the Merits of QNAME Minimization · ICNP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

query modeling · 1.7information leakage quantification · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Modeling DNS Queries and Caching to Evaluate the Merits of QNAME Minimization
abstract
QNAME minimization is an extension to the DNS protocol, designed to allow DNS resolvers to prevent disclosure of DNS activity beyond that which is necessary for resolution. Since it was originally proposed in 2014, QNAME minimization has been incorporated into most of the well-known DNS resolvers. But the question remains: how effective is QNAME minimization at preserving privacy in practice? We answer that question by creating a model that defines DNS privacy roles and quantifies information leakage to third parties. We apply that model to DNS query data from a large university. We observe that QNAME minimization adds modest privacy gains and suggest that its benefits be considered alongside its costs.
Casey T. Deccio, Nathaniel Bennett, Nathan Craddock
ICNP4