Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Philippa Collins

dblp:42/1262 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-8478-0072ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 87% Usable security · 13%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection › surveillance
workplace surveillance
0.912025
Boss is aWare - Are you? Employee Comprehension and Legal Awareness of Workplace Monitoring · CHI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

survey · 0.9semi-structured interviews · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Boss is aWare - Are you? Employee Comprehension and Legal Awareness of Workplace Monitoring
abstract
Bossware, software that monitors worker activity, is a common feature of workplaces. What do workers know about these tools and how they relate to their rights at work? We explored this question through two studies. Study 1 surveyed 100 workers to assess their understanding of work monitoring terminology. Participants were confident in their knowledge of key terms but struggled to accurately define them. Study 2 explored awareness of legal protection in relation to work monitoring through 19 semi-structured online interviews. We found that awareness varied with industry and work role, but was generally low and lacked certainty. Participants were largely skeptical of the use of bossware, questioning its necessity. Limited knowledge of monitoring terminology and legal protection at work further weakens workers' ability to notice and challenge the use of monitoring tools in their workplaces. We finish by speculating on whether educating workers about bossware and workplace rights would help.
Teshan S. Bunwaree, Katarzyna Stawarz, Philippa Collins, Sandy Gould
CHI3