Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Todd Troyer
dblp:42/5052
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
0000-0002-2037-219XORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Automata and formal languages · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience |
0.0 | 2 | 1993 | Grammatical Inference by Attentional Control of Synchronization in an Oscillating Elman Network · NIPS 1993 Synchronization and Grammatical Inference in an Oscillating Elman Net · NIPS 1992 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience › neural dynamics
oscillating neural networks |
0.0 | 2 | 1993 | Grammatical Inference by Attentional Control of Synchronization in an Oscillating Elman Network · NIPS 1993 Synchronization and Grammatical Inference in an Oscillating Elman Net · NIPS 1992 |
Automata and formal languages
grammatical inference |
0.0 | 2 | 1993 | Grammatical Inference by Attentional Control of Synchronization in an Oscillating Elman Network · NIPS 1993 Synchronization and Grammatical Inference in an Oscillating Elman Net · NIPS 1992 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention control |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | Grammatical Inference by Attentional Control of Synchronization in an Oscillating Elman Network · NIPS 1993 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Synchronization and Grammatical Inference in an Oscillating Elman Net · NIPS 1992 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
synchronization analysis · 0.1elman network · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Predicting the Responses of Repetitively Firing Neurons to Current NoiseabstractWe used phase resetting methods to predict firing patterns of rat subthalamic nucleus (STN) neurons when their rhythmic firing was densely perturbed by noise. We applied sequences of contiguous brief (0.5-2 ms) current pulses with amplitudes drawn from a Gaussian distribution (10-100 pA standard deviation) to autonomously firing STN neurons in slices. Current noise sequences increased the variability of spike times with little or no effect on the average firing rate. We measured the infinitesimal phase resetting curve (PRC) for each neuron using a noise-based method. A phase model consisting of only a firing rate and PRC was very accurate at predicting spike timing, accounting for more than 80% of spike time variance and reliably reproducing the spike-to-spike pattern of irregular firing. An approximation for the evolution of phase was used to predict the effect of firing rate and noise parameters on spike timing variability. It quantitatively predicted changes in variability of interspike intervals with variation in noise amplitude, pulse duration and firing rate over the normal range of STN spontaneous rates. When constant current was used to drive the cells to higher rates, the PRC was altered in size and shape and accurate predictions of the effects of noise relied on incorporating these changes into the prediction. Application of rate-neutral changes in conductance showed that changes in PRC shape arise from conductance changes known to accompany rate increases in STN neurons, rather than the rate increases themselves. Our results show that firing patterns of densely perturbed oscillators cannot readily be distinguished from those of neurons randomly excited to fire from the rest state. The spike timing of repetitively firing neurons may be quantitatively predicted from the input and their PRCs, even when they are so densely perturbed that they no longer fire rhythmically. Charles J. Wilson, David Barraza, Todd Troyer, Michael A. Farries |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 3 |
| 2006 | Computational Neuroscience: Trends in Research 2006
Todd Troyer |
Neurocomputing | 1 |
| 1993 | Grammatical Inference by Attentional Control of Synchronization in an Oscillating Elman Network
Bill Baird, Todd Troyer, Frank H. Eeckman |
NIPS | 2 |
| 1992 | Synchronization and Grammatical Inference in an Oscillating Elman Net
Bill Baird, Todd Troyer, Frank H. Eeckman |
NIPS | 2 |