Karen Holtz

dblp:42/511 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Electronic design automation · 70% Parallel and multicore computing · 30%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.212014
Verification of Transactional Memory in POWER8 · DAC 2014
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
processor verification
0.212014
Verification of Transactional Memory in POWER8 · DAC 2014
Parallel and multicore computing
transactional memory
0.212014
Verification of Transactional Memory in POWER8 · DAC 2014
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification
0.011999
A Methodology for the Verification of a "System on Chip" · DAC 1999
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › hardware verification
system-on-chip verification
0.011999
A Methodology for the Verification of a "System on Chip" · DAC 1999
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › hardware verification
verification methodology
0.011999
A Methodology for the Verification of a "System on Chip" · DAC 1999

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pre-silicon simulation · 0.2post-silicon validation · 0.2acceleration · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Verification of Transactional Memory in POWER8
abstract
Transactional memory is a promising mechanism for synchronizing concurrent programs that eliminates locks at the expense of hardware complexity. Transactional memory is a hard feature to verify. First, transactions comprise several instructions that must be observed as a single global atomic operation. In addition, there are many reasons a transaction can fail. This results in a high level of non-determinism which must be tamed by the verification methodology. This paper describes the innovation that was applied to tools and methodology in pre-silicon simulation, acceleration and post-silicon in order to verify transactional memory in the IBM POWER8 processor core.
Allon Adir, Dave Goodman, Daniel Hershcovich, Oz Hershkovitz, Bryan G. Hickerson, Karen Holtz, Wisam Kadry, Anatoly Koyfman, John M. Ludden, Charles Meissner, Amir Nahir, Randall R. Pratt, Mike Schiffli, Brett St. Onge, Brian W. Thompto, Elena Tsanko, Avi Ziv
DAC6
2010 Ontology-Based Tools in the Service of Hardware Verification
Eyal Bin, Alaa Ghanayim, Karen Holtz, Eitan Marcus, Ronny Morad, Ofer Peled, Michal Rimon, Gil Shurek, Elena Tsanko
SEKE3
1999 A Methodology for the Verification of a "System on Chip"
abstract
This paper summarizes the verification effort of a complex ASIC designated to be an “all in one” ISDN network router. This ASIC is unique because it actually consists of many independent components, called “cores ” (including the processor). The integration of these components onto one chip results in an ISOC (Integrated System On a Chip). The complexity of verifying an ISOC is virtually impossible without a proper methodology. This paper presents the methodology developed for verifying the router. In particular, the verification method as well as the tools that were built to execute this method are presented. Finally, a summary of the verification results is given.
Daniel Geist, Giora Biran, Tamarah Arons, Michael Slavkin, Yvgeny Nustov, Monica Farkas, Karen Holtz, Andy Long, Steve Barret
DAC7