Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andreas Argyriou

dblp:42/5125 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
13ranked-venue papers
11as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 13 · 11 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
9 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 32% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 26% Learning paradigms · 16%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 87% Knowledge graphs · 13%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 23 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems › knowledge-aware recommendation
knowledge graph-based recommendation
0.412020
In Search for a Cure: Recommendation With Knowledge Graph on CORD-19 · KDD 2020
Recommender systems › content recommendation
paper recommendation
0.412020
In Search for a Cure: Recommendation With Knowledge Graph on CORD-19 · KDD 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization
0.432014
A Unifying View of Representer Theorems · ICML 2014
Sparse Prediction with the $k$-Support Norm · NIPS 2012
A Spectral Regularization Framework for Multi-Task Structure Learning · NIPS 2007
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods
representer theorem
0.322014
A Unifying View of Representer Theorems · ICML 2014
When Is There a Representer Theorem? Vector Versus Matrix Regularizers · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2009
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.212014
A Unifying View of Representer Theorems · ICML 2014
Mathematical optimization › constrained optimization
optimality conditions
0.212014
A Unifying View of Representer Theorems · ICML 2014
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convex relaxation
0.112012
Sparse Prediction with the $k$-Support Norm · NIPS 2012
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › regularized optimization
k-support norm
0.112012
Sparse Prediction with the $k$-Support Norm · NIPS 2012
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
sparse regularization
0.112012
Sparse Prediction with the $k$-Support Norm · NIPS 2012
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning
0.122007
A Spectral Regularization Framework for Multi-Task Structure Learning · NIPS 2007
Multi-Task Feature Learning · NIPS 2006
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph construction
0.112020
In Search for a Cure: Recommendation With Knowledge Graph on CORD-19 · KDD 2020
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods
0.122006
A DC-programming algorithm for kernel selection · ICML 2006
Learning Convex Combinations of Continuously Parameterized Basic Kernels · COLT 2005
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
spectral learning
0.112010
On Spectral Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2010
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
spectral regularization
0.112007
A Spectral Regularization Framework for Multi-Task Structure Learning · NIPS 2007
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel selection
0.112006
A DC-programming algorithm for kernel selection · ICML 2006
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
shared feature learning
0.112006
Multi-Task Feature Learning · NIPS 2006
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › multi-task learning
shared feature representation
0.112006
Multi-Task Feature Learning · NIPS 2006
Mathematical optimization › nonconvex optimization
difference of convex programming
0.112006
A DC-programming algorithm for kernel selection · ICML 2006
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization
0.112006
A DC-programming algorithm for kernel selection · ICML 2006
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning
graph-based semi-supervised learning
0.112005
Combining Graph Laplacians for Semi-Supervised Learning · NIPS 2005
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph kernel
0.112005
Combining Graph Laplacians for Semi-Supervised Learning · NIPS 2005
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods
kernel learning
0.112005
Learning Convex Combinations of Continuously Parameterized Basic Kernels · COLT 2005
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning
0.112005
Combining Graph Laplacians for Semi-Supervised Learning · NIPS 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

knowledge graph · 0.4orthomonotone functions · 0.4hilbertian penalties · 0.4elastic net · 0.1convex relaxation · 0.1alternating minimization · 0.1greedy algorithm · 0.1DC programming · 0.1convex optimization · 0.1spectral methods · 0.1spectral function regularization · 0.1minimax optimization · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 In Search for a Cure: Recommendation With Knowledge Graph on CORD-19
abstract
The whole globe has cranked up for coping with the COVID-19 situation. The hands-on tutorial targets at providing a comprehensive and pragmatic end-to-end walk-through for building an academic research paper recommender for the use case of COVID-19 related study, with the help of knowledge graph technology. The code examples that demonstrate the theories are reproducible and can hopefully provide value for researchers to build tools that support conducting research to find a cure to COVID-19.
Iris Shen, Jianxun Lian, Chieh-Han Wu, Miguel González-Fierro, Andreas Argyriou
KDD6
2015 Convex relaxations of penalties for sparse correlated variables with bounded total variation
Eugene Belilovsky, Andreas Argyriou, Gaël Varoquaux, Matthew B. Blaschko
Mach. Learn.2
2014 A Unifying View of Representer Theorems
abstract
It is known that the solution of regularization and interpolation problems with Hilbertian penalties can be expressed as a linear combination of the data. This very useful property, called the representer theorem, has been widely studied and applied to machine learning problems. Analogous optimality conditions have appeared in other contexts, notably in matrix regularization. In this paper we propose a unified view, which generalizes the concept of representer theorems and extends necessary and sufficient conditions for such theorems to hold. Our main result shows a close connection between representer theorems and certain classes of regularization penalties, which we call orthomonotone functions. This result not only subsumes previous representer theorems as special cases but also yields a new class of optimality conditions, which goes beyond the classical linear combination of the data. Moreover, orthomonotonicity provides a useful criterion for testing whether a representer theorem holds for a specific regularization problem.
Andreas Argyriou, Francesco Dinuzzo
ICML1
2012 Sparse Prediction with the $k$-Support Norm
abstract
We derive a novel norm that corresponds to the tightest convex relaxation of sparsity combined with an $\ell_2$ penalty. We show that this new norm provides a tighter relaxation than the elastic net, and is thus a good replacement for the Lasso or the elastic net in sparse prediction problems. But through studying our new norm, we also bound the looseness of the elastic net, thus shedding new light on it and providing justification for its use.
Andreas Argyriou, Rina Foygel Barber, Nathan Srebro
NIPS1
2010 On Spectral Learning
Andreas Argyriou, Charles A. Micchelli, Massimiliano Pontil
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2009 When Is There a Representer Theorem? Vector Versus Matrix Regularizers
Andreas Argyriou, Charles A. Micchelli, Massimiliano Pontil
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2008 An Algorithm for Transfer Learning in a Heterogeneous Environment
Andreas Argyriou, Andreas Maurer, Massimiliano Pontil
ECML/PKDD (1)1
2008 Convex multi-task feature learning
Andreas Argyriou, Theodoros Evgeniou, Massimiliano Pontil
Mach. Learn.1
2007 A Spectral Regularization Framework for Multi-Task Structure Learning
abstract
Learning the common structure shared by a set of supervised tasks is an important practical and theoretical problem. Knowledge of this structure may lead to bet- ter generalization performance on the tasks and may also facilitate learning new tasks. We propose a framework for solving this problem, which is based on reg- ularization with spectral functions of matrices. This class of regularization prob- lems exhibits appealing computational properties and can be optimized ef(cid:2)ciently by an alternating minimization algorithm. In addition, we provide a necessary and suf(cid:2)cient condition for convexity of the regularizer. We analyze concrete ex- amples of the framework, which are equivalent to regularization with Lp matrix norms. Experiments on two real data sets indicate that the algorithm scales well with the number of tasks and improves on state of the art statistical performance.
Andreas Argyriou, Charles A. Micchelli, Massimiliano Pontil, Yiming Ying
NIPS1
2006 A DC-programming algorithm for kernel selection
abstract
We address the problem of learning a kernel for a given supervised learning task. Our approach consists in searching within the convex hull of a prescribed set of basic kernels for one which minimizes a convex regularization functional. A unique feature of this approach compared to others in the literature is that the number of basic kernels can be infinite. We only require that they are continuously parameterized. For example, the basic kernels could be isotropic Gaussians with variance in a prescribed interval or even Gaussians parameterized by multiple continuous parameters. Our work builds upon a formulation involving a minimax optimization problem and a recently proposed greedy algorithm for learning the kernel. Although this optimization problem is not convex, it belongs to the larger class of DC (difference of convex functions) programs. Therefore, we apply recent results from DC optimization theory to create a new algorithm for learning the kernel. Our experimental results on benchmark data sets show that this algorithm outperforms a previously proposed method.
Andreas Argyriou, Raphael Hauser, Charles A. Micchelli, Massimiliano Pontil
ICML1
2006 Multi-Task Feature Learning
abstract
We present a method for learning a low-dimensional representation which is shared across a set of multiple related tasks. The method builds upon the well- known 1-norm regularization problem using a new regularizer which controls the number of learned features common for all the tasks. We show that this problem is equivalent to a convex optimization problem and develop an iterative algorithm for solving it. The algorithm has a simple interpretation: it alternately performs a supervised and an unsupervised step, where in the latter step we learn common- across-tasks representations and in the former step we learn task-specific functions using these representations. We report experiments on a simulated and a real data set which demonstrate that the proposed method dramatically improves the per- formance relative to learning each task independently. Our algorithm can also be used, as a special case, to simply select – not learn – a few common features across the tasks.
Andreas Argyriou, Theodoros Evgeniou, Massimiliano Pontil
NIPS1
2005 Learning Convex Combinations of Continuously Parameterized Basic Kernels
Andreas Argyriou, Charles A. Micchelli, Massimiliano Pontil
COLT1
2005 Combining Graph Laplacians for Semi-Supervised Learning
abstract
A foundational problem in semi-supervised learning is the construction of a graph underlying the data. We propose to use a method which optimally combines a number of differently constructed graphs. For each of these graphs we associate a basic graph kernel. We then compute an optimal combined kernel. This kernel solves an extended regularization problem which requires a joint minimization over both the data and the set of graph kernels. We present encouraging results on different OCR tasks where the optimal combined kernel is computed from graphs constructed with a variety of distances functions and the `k ' in nearest neighbors.
Andreas Argyriou, Mark Herbster, Massimiliano Pontil
NIPS1