Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zhaosong Lu
dblp:42/6774
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-3277-7853ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 4 since 2021Theory of computation · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
6 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Machine learning and data management · 63% Data mining · 28% Recommender systems · 10% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization |
0.9 | 2 | 2024 | Single-Loop Stochastic Algorithms for Difference of Max-Structured Weakly Convex Functions · NeurIPS 2024 A General Iterative Shrinkage and Thresholding Algorithm for Non-convex Regularized Optimization Problems · ICML (2) 2013 |
Mathematical optimization
minimax optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Single-Loop Stochastic Algorithms for Difference of Max-Structured Weakly Convex Functions · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient-based optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Generalized-Smooth Nonconvex Optimization is As Efficient As Smooth Nonconvex Optimization · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Generalized-Smooth Nonconvex Optimization is As Efficient As Smooth Nonconvex Optimization · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization › gradient descent
normalized gradient descent |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Generalized-Smooth Nonconvex Optimization is As Efficient As Smooth Nonconvex Optimization · ICML 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
composite optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Parameter-Free Conditional Gradient Method for Composite Minimization under Hölder Condition · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods
conditional gradient method |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Parameter-Free Conditional Gradient Method for Composite Minimization under Hölder Condition · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning and data management › matrix completion
low-rank matrix completion |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Rank-One Matrix Pursuit for Matrix Completion · ICML 2014 |
Machine learning and data management
matrix completion |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Rank-One Matrix Pursuit for Matrix Completion · ICML 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
biomarker discovery |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | FeaFiner: biomarker identification from medical data through feature generalization and selection · KDD 2013 |
Data mining › dimensionality reduction
feature selection |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | FeaFiner: biomarker identification from medical data through feature generalization and selection · KDD 2013 |
Mathematical optimization
sparse learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | A General Iterative Shrinkage and Thresholding Algorithm for Non-convex Regularized Optimization Problems · ICML (2) 2013 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › matrix optimization › matrix recovery › matrix completion
low-rank matrix completion |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Penalty Decomposition Methods for Rank Minimization · NIPS 2011 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
matrix optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Penalty Decomposition Methods for Rank Minimization · NIPS 2011 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › matrix optimization
rank minimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Penalty Decomposition Methods for Rank Minimization · NIPS 2011 |
Recommender systems
collaborative filtering |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Rank-One Matrix Pursuit for Matrix Completion · ICML 2014 |
Mathematical optimization
convergence analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | A General Iterative Shrinkage and Thresholding Algorithm for Non-convex Regularized Optimization Problems · ICML (2) 2013 |
Mathematical optimization
sparse optimization |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | FeaFiner: biomarker identification from medical data through feature generalization and selection · KDD 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variance reduction · 1.4line search · 0.8stochastic gradient descent · 0.8moreau envelope · 0.8descent lemma · 0.7conditional gradient method · 0.7SPIDER · 0.7singular value decomposition · 0.4rank-one matrix pursuit · 0.4orthogonal matching pursuit · 0.4spectral projected gradient method · 0.3double sparsity optimization · 0.3augmented lagrangian method · 0.3proximal gradient · 0.2nesterov acceleration · 0.2coordinate descent · 0.2iterative shrinkage and thresholding · 0.2barzilai-borwein rule · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Single-Loop Stochastic Algorithms for Difference of Max-Structured Weakly Convex FunctionsabstractIn this paper, we study a class of non-smooth non-convex problems in the form of $\min_{x}[\max_{y\in\mathcal Y}\phi(x, y) - \max_{z\in\mathcal Z}\psi(x, z)]$, where both $\Phi(x) = \max_{y\in\mathcal Y}\phi(x, y)$ and $\Psi(x)=\max_{z\in\mathcal Z}\psi(x, z)$ are weakly convex functions, and $\phi(x, y), \psi(x, z)$ are strongly concave functions in terms of $y$ and $z$, respectively. It covers two families of problems that have been studied but are missing single-loop stochastic algorithms, i.e., difference of weakly convex functions and weakly convex strongly-concave min-max problems. We propose a stochastic Moreau envelope approximate gradient method dubbed SMAG, the first single-loop algorithm for solving these problems, and provide a state-of-the-art non-asymptotic convergence rate. The key idea of the design is to compute an approximate gradient of the Moreau envelopes of $\Phi, \Psi$ using only one step of stochastic gradient update of the primal and dual variables. Empirically, we conduct experiments on positive-unlabeled (PU) learning and partial area under ROC curve (pAUC) optimization with an adversarial fairness regularizer to validate the effectiveness of our proposed algorithms. Quanqi Hu, Qi Qi 0006, Zhaosong Lu, Tianbao Yang |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2023 | Generalized-Smooth Nonconvex Optimization is As Efficient As Smooth Nonconvex OptimizationabstractVarious optimal gradient-based algorithms have been developed for smooth nonconvex optimization. However, many nonconvex machine learning problems do not belong to the class of smooth functions and therefore the existing algorithms are sub-optimal. Instead, these problems have been shown to satisfy certain generalized-smooth conditions, which have not been well understood in the existing literature. In this paper, we propose a notion of $\alpha$-symmetric generalized-smoothness that substantially extends the existing notions and covers many important functions such as high-order polynomials and exponential functions. We study the fundamental properties and establish descent lemmas for the functions in this class. Then, to solve such a large class of nonconvex problems, we design a special deterministic normalized gradient descent algorithm that achieves the optimal iteration complexity $\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^{-2})$, and also prove that the popular SPIDER variance reduction algorithm achieves the optimal sample complexity $\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^{-3})$. Our results show that solving generalized-smooth nonconvex problems is as efficient as solving smooth nonconvex problems. Ziyi Chen 0002, Yi Zhou 0017, Yingbin Liang, Zhaosong Lu |
ICML | 4 |
| 2023 | FastPicker: Adaptive independent two-stage video-to-video summarization for efficient action recognition
Saghir Ahmed Saghir Alfasly, Jian Lu 0002, Chen Xu 0004, Zaid Al-Huda, Qingtang Jiang, Zhaosong Lu, Charles K. Chui |
Neurocomputing | 6 |
| 2023 | A Parameter-Free Conditional Gradient Method for Composite Minimization under Hölder ConditionabstractIn this paper we consider a composite optimization problem that minimizes the sum of a weakly smooth function and a convex function with either a bounded domain or a uniformly convex structure. In particular, we first present a parameter-dependent conditional gradient method for this problem, whose step sizes require prior knowledge of the parameters associated with the Hölder continuity of the gradient of the weakly smooth function, and establish its rate of convergence. Given that these parameters could be unknown or known but possibly conservative, such a method may suffer from implementation issue or slow convergence. We therefore propose a parameter-free conditional gradient method whose step size is determined by using a constructive local quadratic upper approximation and an adaptive line search scheme, without using any problem parameter. We show that this method achieves the same rate of convergence as the parameter-dependent conditional gradient method. Preliminary experiments are also conducted and illustrate the superior performance of the parameter-free conditional gradient method over the methods with some other step size rules. Masaru Ito, Zhaosong Lu, Chuan He 0004 |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2014 | Rank-One Matrix Pursuit for Matrix CompletionabstractLow rank matrix completion has been applied successfully in a wide range of machine learning applications, such as collaborative filtering, image inpainting and Microarray data imputation. However, many existing algorithms are not scalable to large-scale problems, as they involve computing singular value decomposition. In this paper, we present an efficient and scalable algorithm for matrix completion. The key idea is to extend the well-known orthogonal matching pursuit from the vector case to the matrix case. In each iteration, we pursue a rank-one matrix basis generated by the top singular vector pair of the current approximation residual and update the weights for all rank-one matrices obtained up to the current iteration. We further propose a novel weight updating rule to reduce the time and storage complexity, making the proposed algorithm scalable to large matrices. We establish the linear convergence of the proposed algorithm. The fast convergence is achieved due to the proposed construction of matrix bases and the estimation of the weights. We empirically evaluate the proposed algorithm on many real-world large scale datasets. Results show that our algorithm is much more efficient than state-of-the-art matrix completion algorithms while achieving similar or better prediction performance. Zheng Wang 0011, Ming-Jun Lai, Zhaosong Lu, Wei Fan 0001, Hasan Davulcu, Jieping Ye |
ICML | 3 |
| 2014 | An Accelerated Proximal Coordinate Gradient Method
Qihang Lin, Zhaosong Lu |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2013 | A General Iterative Shrinkage and Thresholding Algorithm for Non-convex Regularized Optimization ProblemsabstractNon-convex sparsity-inducing penalties have recently received considerable attentions in sparse learning. Recent theoretical investigations have demonstrated their superiority over the convex counterparts in several sparse learning settings. However, solving the non-convex optimization problems associated with non-convex penalties remains a big challenge. A commonly used approach is the Multi-Stage (MS) convex relaxation (or DC programming), which relaxes the original non-convex problem to a sequence of convex problems. This approach is usually not very practical for large-scale problems because its computational cost is a multiple of solving a single convex problem. In this paper, we propose a General Iterative Shrinkage and Thresholding (GIST) algorithm to solve the nonconvex optimization problem for a large class of non-convex penalties. The GIST algorithm iteratively solves a proximal operator problem, which in turn has a closed-form solution for many commonly used penalties. At each outer iteration of the algorithm, we use a line search initialized by the Barzilai-Borwein (BB) rule that allows finding an appropriate step size quickly. The paper also presents a detailed convergence analysis of the GIST algorithm. The efficiency of the proposed algorithm is demonstrated by extensive experiments on large-scale data sets. Pinghua Gong, Changshui Zhang, Zhaosong Lu, Jieping Ye |
ICML (2) | 3 |
| 2013 | FeaFiner: biomarker identification from medical data through feature generalization and selectionabstractTraditionally, feature construction and feature selection are two important but separate processes in data mining. However, many real world applications require an integrated approach for creating, refining and selecting features. To address this problem, we propose FeaFiner (short for Feature Refiner), an efficient formulation that simultaneously generalizes low-level features into higher level concepts and then selects relevant concepts based on the target variable. Specifically, we formulate a double sparsity optimization problem that identifies groups in the low-level features, generalizes higher level features using the groups and performs feature selection. Since in many clinical researches non- overlapping groups are preferred for better interpretability, we further improve the formulation to generalize features using mutually exclusive feature groups. The proposed formulation is challenging to solve due to the orthogonality constraints, non-convexity objective and non-smoothness penal- ties. We apply a recently developed augmented Lagrangian method to solve this formulation in which each subproblem is solved by a non-monotone spectral projected gradient method. Our numerical experiments show that this approach is computationally efficient and also capable of producing solutions of high quality. We also present a generalization bound showing the consistency and the asymptotic behavior of the learning process of our proposed formulation. Zhaosong Lu, Jimeng Sun 0001, Lei Yuan 0001, Fei Wang 0001, Jieping Ye |
KDD | 2 |
| 2013 | Assessing the Value of Dynamic Pricing in Network Revenue ManagementabstractDynamic pricing for a network of resources over a finite selling horizon has received considerable attention in recent years, yet few papers provide effective computational approaches to solve the problem. We consider a resource decomposition approach to solve the problem and investigate the performance of the approach in a computational study. We compare the performance of the approach to static pricing and choice-based availability control. Our numerical results show that dynamic pricing policies from network resource decomposition can achieve significant revenue lift compared with choice-based availability control and static pricing, even when the latter is frequently resolved. As a by-product of our approach, network decomposition provides an upper bound in revenue, which is provably tighter than the well-known upper bound from a deterministic approximation. Dan Zhang 0005, Zhaosong Lu |
INFORMS J. Comput. | 2 |
| 2011 | Penalty Decomposition Methods for Rank MinimizationabstractIn this paper we consider general rank minimization problems with rank appearing in either objective function or constraint. We first show that a class of matrix optimization problems can be solved as lower dimensional vector optimization problems. As a consequence, we establish that a class of rank minimization problems have closed form solutions. Using this result, we then propose penalty decomposition methods for general rank minimization problems. The convergence results of the PD methods have been shown in the longer version of the paper. Finally, we test the performance of our methods by applying them to matrix completion and nearest low-rank correlation matrix problems. The computational results demonstrate that our methods generally outperform the existing methods in terms of solution quality and/or speed. Yong Zhang 0004, Zhaosong Lu |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2004 | Optimal Solutions for the Closest-String Problem via Integer ProgrammingabstractIn this paper we study the closest-string problem (CSP), which can be defined as follows: Given a finite set 𝒮 = {s1, s2, …, sn} of strings, each string with length m, find a center string t of length m minimizing d, such that for every string si ∈ 𝒮, dH(t, si) ≤ d. By dH(t, si) we mean the Hamming distance between t and si. This is an NP-hard problem, with applications in molecular biology and coding theory. Even though there are good approximation algorithms for this problem, and exact algorithms for instances with d constant, there are no studies trying to solve it exactly for the general case. In this paper we propose three integer-programming (IP) formulations and a heuristic, which is used to provide upper bounds on the value of an optimal solution. We report computational results of a branch-and-bound algorithm based on one of the IP formulations, and of the heuristic, executed over randomly generated instances. These results show that it is possible to solve CSP instances of moderate size to optimality. Cláudio Nogueira de Meneses, Zhaosong Lu, Carlos A. S. Oliveira, Panos M. Pardalos |
INFORMS J. Comput. | 2 |