Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matthew D. Piggott
dblp:42/8769 · also M. D. Piggott
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-7526-6853ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Graph learning · 70% 3D vision · 30% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Computer animation and physical simulation · 50% Image and video processing · 50% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational science and engineering › numerical analysis
mesh movement |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | Towards Universal Mesh Movement Networks · NeurIPS 2024 M2N: Mesh Movement Networks for PDE Solvers · NeurIPS 2022 |
Computational science and engineering
numerical simulation |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | Towards Universal Mesh Movement Networks · NeurIPS 2024 Goal-Oriented Error Estimation and Mesh Adaptation for Tracer Transport Modelling · Comput. Aided Des. 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Universal Mesh Movement Networks · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › attention-based graph neural network
graph attention network |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | M2N: Mesh Movement Networks for PDE Solvers · NeurIPS 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
optical flow |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning to Estimate and Refine Fluid Motion with Physical Dynamics · ICML 2022 |
Computational science and engineering › numerical analysis
adaptive mesh refinement |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Goal-Oriented Error Estimation and Mesh Adaptation for Tracer Transport Modelling · Comput. Aided Des. 2022 |
Computational science and engineering
partial differential equation solver |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | M2N: Mesh Movement Networks for PDE Solvers · NeurIPS 2022 |
Image and video processing › motion estimation
fluid flow estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning to Estimate and Refine Fluid Motion with Physical Dynamics · ICML 2022 |
Computer animation and physical simulation
fluid simulation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning to Estimate and Refine Fluid Motion with Physical Dynamics · ICML 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
graph attention network · 2.7graph transformer · 1.5flow matching · 1.5unsupervised learning · 1.1operator splitting · 1.1neural spline model · 1.1monge-ampère method · 1.1PDE-constrained prediction · 1.1mesh adaptation · 0.6goal-oriented error estimation · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Towards Universal Mesh Movement NetworksabstractSolving complex Partial Differential Equations (PDEs) accurately and efficiently is an essential and challenging problem in all scientific and engineering disciplines. Mesh movement methods provide the capability to improve the accuracy of the numerical solution without increasing the overall mesh degree of freedom count. Conventional sophisticated mesh movement methods are extremely expensive and struggle to handle scenarios with complex boundary geometries. However, existing learning-based methods require re-training from scratch given a different PDE type or boundary geometry, which limits their applicability, and also often suffer from robustness issues in the form of inverted elements. In this paper, we introduce the Universal Mesh Movement Network (UM2N), which -- once trained -- can be applied in a non-intrusive, zero-shot manner to move meshes with different size distributions and structures, for solvers applicable to different PDE types and boundary geometries. UM2N consists of a Graph Transformer (GT) encoder for extracting features and a Graph Attention Network (GAT) based decoder for moving the mesh. We evaluate our method on advection and Navier-Stokes based examples, as well as a real-world tsunami simulation case. Our method out-performs existing learning-based mesh movement methods in terms of the benchmarks described above. In comparison to the conventional sophisticated Monge-Ampère PDE-solver based method, our approach not only significantly accelerates mesh movement, but also proves effective in scenarios where the conventional method fails. Our project page can be found at https://erizmr.github.io/UM2N/. Stephan C. Kramer, Joseph G. Wallwork, Jiancheng Liu, Matthew D. Piggott |
NeurIPS | 8 |
| 2022 | Learning to Estimate and Refine Fluid Motion with Physical DynamicsabstractExtracting information on fluid motion directly from images is challenging. Fluid flow represents a complex dynamic system governed by the Navier-Stokes equations. General optical flow methods are typically designed for rigid body motion, and thus struggle if applied to fluid motion estimation directly. Further, optical flow methods only focus on two consecutive frames without utilising historical temporal information, while the fluid motion (velocity field) can be considered a continuous trajectory constrained by time-dependent partial differential equations (PDEs). This discrepancy has the potential to induce physically inconsistent estimations. Here we propose an unsupervised learning based prediction-correction scheme for fluid flow estimation. An estimate is first given by a PDE-constrained optical flow predictor, which is then refined by a physical based corrector. The proposed approach outperforms optical flow methods and shows competitive results compared to existing supervised learning based methods on a benchmark dataset. Furthermore, the proposed approach can generalize to complex real-world fluid scenarios where ground truth information is effectively unknowable. Finally, experiments demonstrate that the physical corrector can refine flow estimates by mimicking the operator splitting method commonly utilised in fluid dynamical simulation. James Tlhomole, Matthew D. Piggott |
ICML | 4 |
| 2022 | M2N: Mesh Movement Networks for PDE SolversabstractNumerical Partial Differential Equation (PDE) solvers often require discretizing the physical domain by using a mesh. Mesh movement methods provide the capability to improve the accuracy of the numerical solution without introducing extra computational burden to the PDE solver, by increasing mesh resolution where the solution is not well-resolved, whilst reducing unnecessary resolution elsewhere. However, sophisticated mesh movement methods, such as the Monge-Ampère method, generally require the solution of auxiliary equations. These solutions can be extremely expensive to compute when the mesh needs to be adapted frequently. In this paper, we propose to the best of our knowledge the first learning-based end-to-end mesh movement framework for PDE solvers. Key requirements of learning-based mesh movement methods are: alleviating mesh tangling, boundary consistency, and generalization to mesh with different resolutions. To achieve these goals, we introduce the neural spline model and the graph attention network (GAT) into our models respectively. While the Neural-Spline based model provides more flexibility for large mesh deformation, the GAT based model can handle domains with more complicated shapes and is better at performing delicate local deformation. We validate our methods on stationary and time-dependent, linear and non-linear equations, as well as regularly and irregularly shaped domains. Compared to the traditional Monge-Ampère method, our approach can greatly accelerate the mesh adaptation process by three to four orders of magnitude, whilst achieving comparable numerical error reduction. Wenbin Song, Joseph G. Wallwork, Junpeng Gao, Zheng Tian 0002, Fanglei Sun, Matthew D. Piggott, Zuoqiang Shi, Jun Wang 0012 |
NeurIPS | 7 |
| 2022 | Goal-Oriented Error Estimation and Mesh Adaptation for Tracer Transport Modelling
Joseph G. Wallwork, Nicolas Barral, David A. Ham, Matthew D. Piggott |
Comput. Aided Des. | 4 |
| 2022 | Investigating microscale patchiness of motile microbes under turbulence in a simulated convective mixed layerabstractMicrobes play a primary role in aquatic ecosystems and biogeochemical cycles. Spatial patchiness is a critical factor underlying these activities, influencing biological productivity, nutrient cycling and dynamics across trophic levels. Incorporating spatial dynamics into microbial models is a long-standing challenge, particularly where small-scale turbulence is involved. Here, we combine a fully 3D direct numerical simulation of convective mixed layer turbulence, with an individual-based microbial model to test the key hypothesis that the coupling of gyrotactic motility and turbulence drives intense microscale patchiness. The fluid model simulates turbulent convection caused by heat loss through the fluid surface, for example during the night, during autumnal or winter cooling or during a cold-air outbreak. We find that under such conditions, turbulence-driven patchiness is depth-structured and requires high motility: Near the fluid surface, intense convective turbulence overpowers motility, homogenising motile and non-motile microbes approximately equally. At greater depth, in conditions analogous to a thermocline, highly motile microbes can be over twice as patch-concentrated as non-motile microbes, and can substantially amplify their swimming velocity by efficiently exploiting fast-moving packets of fluid. Our results substantiate the predictions of earlier studies, and demonstrate that turbulence-driven patchiness is not a ubiquitous consequence of motility but rather a delicate balance of motility and turbulent intensity. Alexander Kier Christensen, Matthew D. Piggott, Erik van Sebille, Maarten van Reeuwijk, Samraat Pawar |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 2 |