Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrija Tomovic

dblp:42/970 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › multiple sequence alignment
alignment quality assessment
0.112007
Quality estimation of multiple sequence alignments by Bayesian hypothesis testing · Bioinform. 2007
Bioinformatics and computational biology
multiple sequence alignment
0.112007
Quality estimation of multiple sequence alignments by Bayesian hypothesis testing · Bioinform. 2007
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence alignment
0.112007
Quality estimation of multiple sequence alignments by Bayesian hypothesis testing · Bioinform. 2007
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
transcription factor binding site prediction
0.112007
Position dependencies in transcription factor binding sites · Bioinform. 2007
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein analysis › protein bioinformatics
protein-DNA interaction
0.012007
Position dependencies in transcription factor binding sites · Bioinform. 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical hypothesis testing · 0.1scoring function design · 0.1bayesian hypothesis testing · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Transcription factor site dependencies in human, mouse and rat genomes
abstract
BACKGROUND: It is known that transcription factors frequently act together to regulate gene expression in eukaryotes. In this paper we describe a computational analysis of transcription factor site dependencies in human, mouse and rat genomes. RESULTS: Our approach for quantifying tendencies of transcription factor binding sites to co-occur is based on a binding site scoring function which incorporates dependencies between positions, the use of information about the structural class of each transcription factor (major/minor groove binder), and also considered the possible implications of varying GC content of the sequences. Significant tendencies (dependencies) have been detected by non-parametric statistical methodology (permutation tests). Evaluation of obtained results has been performed in several ways: reports from literature (many of the significant dependencies between transcription factors have previously been confirmed experimentally); dependencies between transcription factors are not biased due to similarities in their DNA-binding sites; the number of dependent transcription factors that belong to the same functional and structural class is significantly higher than would be expected by chance; supporting evidence from GO clustering of targeting genes. Based on dependencies between two transcription factor binding sites (second-order dependencies), it is possible to construct higher-order dependencies (networks). Moreover results about transcription factor binding sites dependencies can be used for prediction of groups of dependent transcription factors on a given promoter sequence. Our results, as well as a scanning tool for predicting groups of dependent transcription factors binding sites are available on the Internet. CONCLUSION: We show that the computational analysis of transcription factor site dependencies is a valuable complement to experimental approaches for discovering transcription regulatory interactions and networks. Scanning promoter sequences with dependent groups of transcription factor binding sites improve the quality of transcription factor predictions.
Andrija Tomovic, Michael B. Stadler, Edward J. Oakeley
BMC Bioinform.1
2007 Position dependencies in transcription factor binding sites
abstract
MOTIVATION: Most of the available tools for transcription factor binding site prediction are based on methods which assume no sequence dependence between the binding site base positions. Our primary objective was to investigate the statistical basis for either a claim of dependence or independence, to determine whether such a claim is generally true, and to use the resulting data to develop improved scoring functions for binding-site prediction. RESULTS: Using three statistical tests, we analyzed the number of binding sites showing dependent positions. We analyzed transcription factor-DNA crystal structures for evidence of position dependence. Our final conclusions were that some factors show evidence of dependencies whereas others do not. We observed that the conformational energy (Z-score) of the transcription factor-DNA complexes was lower (better) for sequences that showed dependency than for those that did not (P < 0.02). We suggest that where evidence exists for dependencies, these should be modeled to improve binding-site predictions. However, when no significant dependency is found, this correction should be omitted. This may be done by converting any existing scoring function which assumes independence into a form which includes a dependency correction. We present an example of such an algorithm and its implementation as a web tool. AVAILABILITY: http://promoterplot.fmi.ch/cgi-bin/dep.html
Andrija Tomovic, Edward J. Oakeley
Bioinform.1
2007 Quality estimation of multiple sequence alignments by Bayesian hypothesis testing
abstract
UNLABELLED: In this work we present a web-based tool for estimating multiple alignment quality using Bayesian hypothesis testing. The proposed method is very simple, easily implemented and not time consuming with a linear complexity. We evaluated method against a series of different alignments (a set of random and biologically derived alignments) and compared the results with tools based on classical statistical methods (such as sFFT and csFFT). Taking correlation coefficient as an objective criterion of the true quality, we found that Bayesian hypothesis testing performed better on average than the classical methods we tested. This approach may be used independently or as a component of any tool in computational biology which is based on the statistical estimation of alignment quality. AVAILABILITY: http://www.fmi.ch/groups/functional.genomics/tool.htm. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available from http://www.fmi.ch/groups/functional.genomics/tool-Supp.htm.
Andrija Tomovic, Edward J. Oakeley
Bioinform.1