Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Haizhi Tang
dblp:420/0267
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-1802-3290ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software testing › fuzzing
API fuzzing |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | MirrorFuzz: Leveraging LLM and Shared Bugs for Deep Learning Framework APIs Fuzzing · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2026 |
Software testing
fuzzing |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | MirrorFuzz: Leveraging LLM and Shared Bugs for Deep Learning Framework APIs Fuzzing · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 2.0code synthesis · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | MirrorFuzz: Leveraging LLM and Shared Bugs for Deep Learning Framework APIs FuzzingabstractDeep learning (DL) frameworks serve as the backbone for a wide range of artificial intelligence applications. However, bugs within DL frameworks can cascade into critical issues in higher-level applications, jeopardizing reliability and security. While numerous techniques have been proposed to detect bugs in DL frameworks, research exploring common API patterns across frameworks and the potential risks they entail remains limited. Notably, many DL frameworks expose similar APIs with overlapping input parameters and functionalities, rendering them vulnerable to shared bugs, where a flaw in one API may extend to analogous APIs in other frameworks. To address this challenge, we propose MirrorFuzz, an automated API fuzzing solution to discover shared bugs in DL frameworks. MirrorFuzz operates in three stages: First, MirrorFuzz collects historical bug data for each API within a DL framework to identify potentially buggy APIs. Second, it matches each buggy API in a specific framework with similar APIs within and across other DL frameworks. Third, it employs large language models (LLMs) to synthesize code for the API under test, leveraging the historical bug data of similar APIs to trigger analogous bugs across APIs. We implement MirrorFuzz and evaluate it on four popular DL frameworks (TensorFlow, PyTorch, OneFlow, and Jittor). Extensive evaluation demonstrates that MirrorFuzz improves code coverage by 39.92% and 98.20% compared to state-of-the-art methods on TensorFlow and PyTorch, respectively. Moreover, MirrorFuzz discovers 315 bugs, 262 of which are newly found, and 80 bugs are fixed, with 52 of these bugs assigned CNVD IDs. Shiwen Ou, Yuwei Li 0002, Chengkun Wei, Tingke Wen, Qiangpu Chen, Yu Chen 0053, Haizhi Tang, Zulie Pan |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 8 |