Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Georgios Karaiskos
dblp:420/4027
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Quantum computing and quantum information · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum state tomography
classical shadow |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | How Hard Is It to Verify a Classical Shadow? · ICALP 2026 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum computing
quantum complexity classes |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | How Hard Is It to Verify a Classical Shadow? · ICALP 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
polynomial hierarchy · 1.0dequantization · 1.0QMA-completeness · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | How Hard Is It to Verify a Classical Shadow?abstractClassical shadows are succinct classical representations of quantum states which allow one to encode a set of properties P of a quantum state ρ, while only requiring measurements on logarithmically many copies of ρ in the size of P. In this work, we initiate the study of verification of classical shadows, denoted classical shadow validity (CSV), from the perspective of computational complexity, which asks: Given a classical shadow S, how hard is it to verify that S predicts the measurement statistics of a quantum state? We first show that even for the elegantly simple classical shadow protocol of [Huang, Kueng, Preskill, Nature Physics 2020] utilizing local Clifford measurements, CSV is QMA-complete. This hardness continues to hold for the high-dimensional extension of said protocol due to [Mao, Yi, and Zhu, PRL 2025]. In contrast, we show that for the HKP and MYZ protocols utilizing global Clifford measurements, CSV can be "dequantized" for low-Frobenius norm observables, i.e., solved in randomized poly-time with standard sampling assumptions. Finally, we show that CSV for exponentially many observables is complete for a quantum generalization of the second level of the polynomial hierarchy, yielding the first natural complete problem for such a class. Georgios Karaiskos, Dorian Rudolph, Johannes Jakob Meyer, Jens Eisert, Sevag Gharibian |
ICALP | 1 |