Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dhananjay Ghumare

dblp:420/4058 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › document retrieval › domain-specific retrieval
legal information retrieval
0.912025
IL-PCSR: Legal Corpus for Prior Case and Statute Retrieval · EMNLP 2025
Information retrieval › document retrieval › domain-specific retrieval › legal information retrieval
precedent retrieval
0.912025
IL-PCSR: Legal Corpus for Prior Case and Statute Retrieval · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semantic retrieval · 0.9lexical retrieval · 0.9graph neural network · 0.9LLM-based reranking · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 IL-PCSR: Legal Corpus for Prior Case and Statute Retrieval
abstract
Identifying/retrieving relevant statutes and prior cases/precedents for a given legal situation are common tasks exercised by law practitioners.Researchers to date have addressed the two tasks independently, thus developing completely different datasets and models for each task; however, both retrieval tasks are inherently related, e.g., similar cases tend to cite similar statutes (due to similar factual situation).In this paper, we address this gap.We propose IL-PCSR (Indian Legal corpus for Prior Case and Statute Retrieval), which is a unique corpus that provides a common testbed for developing models for both the tasks (Statute Retrieval and Precedent Retrieval) that can exploit the dependence between the two.We experiment extensively with several baseline models on the tasks, including lexical models, semantic models and ensemble based on GNNs.Further, to exploit the dependence between the two tasks, we develop an LLM-based re-ranking approach that gives the best performance.
Shounak Paul, Dhananjay Ghumare, Pawan Goyal 0002, Saptarshi Ghosh 0001, Ashutosh Modi
EMNLP2