Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Muchen Pan

dblp:420/7891 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0006-0774-5744ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Authentication and access control · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Virtual and augmented reality · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Authentication and access control
continuous authentication
0.912025
PipID: Light-Pupillary Response Based User Authentication for Virtual Reality · CCS 2025
Authentication and access control
user authentication
0.912025
PipID: Light-Pupillary Response Based User Authentication for Virtual Reality · CCS 2025
Authentication and access control › user authentication
VR authentication
0.912025
PipID: Light-Pupillary Response Based User Authentication for Virtual Reality · CCS 2025
Virtual and augmented reality › immersive display
VR headset
0.312025
PipID: Light-Pupillary Response Based User Authentication for Virtual Reality · CCS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pupillometry · 1.7eye tracking · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 PipID: Light-Pupillary Response Based User Authentication for Virtual Reality
abstract
During the use of Virtual Reality (VR) applications such as gaming, education, and military training, sensitive information may be generated or collected by VR sensors, raising user concerns about potential data leakage. This highlights the critical need for effective user authentication to prevent unauthorized access. Existing authentication methods for VR are often either cumbersome (e.g., entering passwords via handheld controllers), reliant on specialized hardware (e.g., iris recognition), or vulnerable to credential replay attacks. In this study, we propose PipID, a lightweight VR authentication approach that leverages commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) eye trackers integrated into VR headsets. PipID is based on the fact that users' pupillary responses to visual stimuli vary uniquely. Thus, by displaying lights of randomly selected colors (i.e., wavelengths) on the VR screen, PipID can utilize pupil diameter responses to these wavelengths as the basis for authentication. For pupil data collected by precision-limited COTS eye trackers, PipID mitigates the impact of unrelated eye movements (e.g., blinks) and leverages pupillary response differences between the left and right eyes to further enhance the granularity of authentication features. Additionally, the randomized sequence of light colors helps prevent replay attacks. We implemented PipID on a COTS VR headset and tested it with 52 participants. Experimental results show that PipID achieves an accuracy of 98.65% and maintains robust performance under various conditions (e.g., keeping 98% and 91% accuracy after 7 and 14 days respectively).
Muchen Pan, Yan Meng 0001, Yuxia Zhan, Guoxing Chen, Haojin Zhu
CCS1