Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Elif Arslan
dblp:420/9124
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SORTeD Rashomon Sets of Sparse Decision Trees: Anytime Enumeration · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
rashomon set |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SORTeD Rashomon Sets of Sparse Decision Trees: Anytime Enumeration · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
sparse decision trees |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SORTeD Rashomon Sets of Sparse Decision Trees: Anytime Enumeration · NeurIPS 2025 |
Algorithms and data structures › combinatorial algorithms
enumeration algorithms |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | SORTeD Rashomon Sets of Sparse Decision Trees: Anytime Enumeration · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
dynamic programming · 1.7branch-and-bound · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | SORTeD Rashomon Sets of Sparse Decision Trees: Anytime EnumerationabstractSparse decision tree learning provides accurate and interpretable predictive models that are ideal for high-stakes applications by finding the single most accurate tree within a (soft) size limit. Rather than relying on a single “best” tree, Rashomon sets—trees with similar performance but varying structures—can be used to enhance variable importance analysis, enrich explanations, and enable users to choose simpler trees or those that satisfy stakeholder preferences (e.g., fairness) without hard-coding such criteria into the objective function. However, because finding the optimal tree is NP-hard, enumerating the Rashomon set is inherently challenging. Therefore, we introduce SORTD, a novel framework that improves scalability and enumerates trees in the Rashomon set in order of the objective value, thus offering anytime behavior. Our experiments show that SORTD reduces runtime by up to two orders of magnitude compared with the state of the art. Moreover, SORTD can compute Rashomon sets for any separable and totally ordered objective and supports post-evaluating the set using other separable (and partially ordered) objectives. Together, these advances make exploring Rashomon sets more practical in real-world applications. Elif Arslan, Jacobus G. M. van der Linden, Serge P. Hoogendoorn, Marco Rinaldi, Emir Demirovic |
NeurIPS | 1 |