Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Souvik Rana

dblp:420/9837 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 56% Representation and self-supervised learning · 22% Trustworthy machine learning · 11%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › tokenization › subword tokenization
byte-pair encoding
1.012026
MUTANT: A Recipe for Multilingual Tokenizer Design · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › dataset construction
corpus filtering
1.012026
BhashaKritika: Building Synthetic Pretraining Data at Scale for Indic Languages · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › Data-centric AI
data quality evaluation
1.012026
BhashaKritika: Building Synthetic Pretraining Data at Scale for Indic Languages · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › low-resource language processing
low-resource language models
1.012026
BhashaKritika: Building Synthetic Pretraining Data at Scale for Indic Languages · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
multilingual language models
1.012026
BhashaKritika: Building Synthetic Pretraining Data at Scale for Indic Languages · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › pre-training
pretraining data
1.012026
BhashaKritika: Building Synthetic Pretraining Data at Scale for Indic Languages · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › tokenization
subword tokenization
1.012026
MUTANT: A Recipe for Multilingual Tokenizer Design · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › pre-training › data-centric pre-training
synthetic pre-training
1.012026
BhashaKritika: Building Synthetic Pretraining Data at Scale for Indic Languages · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
tokenization
1.012026
MUTANT: A Recipe for Multilingual Tokenizer Design · ACL (1) 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vocabulary design · 1.0synthetic data generation · 1.0perplexity-based filtering · 1.0language-aware pre-tokenization · 1.0KenLM · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 BhashaKritika: Building Synthetic Pretraining Data at Scale for Indic Languages
abstract
In the context of pretraining of Large Language Models (LLMs), synthetic data has emerged as an alternative for generating high-quality pretraining data at scale. This is particularly beneficial in low resource language settings where the benefits of the recent LLMs have been unevenly distributed across languages. In this work, we present a systematic study on the generation and evaluation of synthetic multilingual pretraining data for Indic languages, where we construct a large scale synthetic dataset BhashaKritika, comprising 540B tokens using 5 different techniques for 10 languages. We explore the impact of grounding generation in documents, personas and topics. We analyze how language choice, both in the prompt instructions and document grounding affects data quality and we compare translations of English content with native generation in Indic languages. In order to support scalable and language-sensitive evaluation, we introduce a modular quality evaluation pipeline that integrates script and language detection, metadata consistency checks, n-gram repetition analysis, and perplexity-based filtering using KenLM models. Our framework enables robust quality control across diverse scripts and linguistic contexts. Empirical results through model runs reveal key trade-offs in generation strategies and highlight best practices for constructing effective multilingual corpora. This work contributes practical insights for advanced pretraining recipes in low-resource and script-diverse settings, particularly in the Indian context.
Guduru Manoj, Neel Prabhanjan Rachamalla, Ashish Kulkarni, Gautam Rajeev, Jay Piplodiya, Arul Menezes, Shaharukh Khan, Souvik Rana, Manya Sah, Chandra Khatri
AAAI8
2026 MUTANT: A Recipe for Multilingual Tokenizer Design
abstract
Tokenizers play a crucial role in determining the performance, training efficiency, and the inference cost of Large Language Models (LLMs).Designing effective tokenizers for multilingual LLMs is particularly challenging due to diverse scripts and rich morphological variation.While subword methods like Byte Pair Encoding (BPE) are widely adopted, their effectiveness in multilingual settings remains underexplored.We present MUTANT, a recipe for building multilingual tokenizers, with careful vocabulary and training data design, language-aware pre-tokenization, and subword and multiword aware training.We also introduce MUTANT-Indic, a tokenizer for Indiaspecific multilingual LLMs, that produces linguistically coherent tokens and achieves stateof-the-art performance.Evaluated across English, 22 Indian languages and code data, our tokenizer improves the average fertility score by 39.5% over LLaMA4 and by 18% over Sutra (the current best).This translates to 44% improvement in inference throughput over LLaMA4 while maintaining comparable performance on English and Indic benchmarks.We present detailed ablations across tokenizer training data size, vocabulary size, merging techniques, and pre-tokenization strategies, demonstrating the robustness of our design choices.
Souvik Rana, Ashish Kulkarni, Arul Menezes, Chandra Khatri
ACL (1)1