Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Euijin You
dblp:421/0324
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Optimization for machine learning · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Quadratic Upper Bound for Boosting Robustness · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness › adversarial training
fast adversarial training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Quadratic Upper Bound for Boosting Robustness · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
loss landscape smoothing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Quadratic Upper Bound for Boosting Robustness · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quadratic upper bound · 0.9loss function design · 0.9adversarial training · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Quadratic Upper Bound for Boosting RobustnessabstractFast adversarial training (FAT) aims to enhance the robustness of models against adversarial attacks with reduced training time, however, FAT often suffers from compromised robustness due to insufficient exploration of adversarial space. In this paper, we develop a loss function to mitigate the problem of degraded robustness under FAT. Specifically, we derive a quadratic upper bound (QUB) on the adversarial training (AT) loss function and propose to utilize the bound with existing FAT methods. Our experimental results show that applying QUB loss to the existing methods yields significant improvement of robustness. Furthermore, using various metrics, we demonstrate that this improvement is likely to result from the smoothened loss landscape of the resulting model. Euijin You, Hyang-Won Lee |
ICML | 1 |