Ameya Rathod

dblp:421/1361 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 75% Multi-agent systems · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial attack
1.012026
TAMAS: Benchmarking Adversarial Risks in Multi-Agent LLM Systems · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
1.012026
TAMAS: Benchmarking Adversarial Risks in Multi-Agent LLM Systems · ACL (1) 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
LLM-based multi-agent systems
1.012026
TAMAS: Benchmarking Adversarial Risks in Multi-Agent LLM Systems · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
1.012026
TAMAS: Benchmarking Adversarial Risks in Multi-Agent LLM Systems · ACL (1) 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

benchmarking · 1.0adversarial attack · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 TAMAS: Benchmarking Adversarial Risks in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities as autonomous agents through tool use, planning, and decisionmaking abilities, leading to their widespread adoption across diverse tasks.As task complexity grows, multi-agent LLM systems are increasingly used to solve problems collaboratively.However, safety and security of these systems remains largely under-explored.Existing benchmarks and datasets predominantly focus on single-agent settings, failing to capture the unique vulnerabilities of multi-agent dynamics and co-ordination.To address this gap, we introduce Threats and Attacks in Multi-Agent Systems (TAMAS), a benchmark designed to evaluate the robustness and safety of multi-agent LLM systems.TAMAS includes five distinct scenarios comprising 300 adversarial instances across six attack types and 211 tools, along with 100 harmless tasks.We assess system performance across ten backbone LLMs and three agent interaction configurations from Autogen and CrewAI frameworks, highlighting critical challenges and failure modes in current multi-agent deployments.Furthermore, we introduce Effective Robustness Score (ERS) to assess the tradeoff between safety and task effectiveness of these frameworks.Our findings show that multi-agent systems are highly vulnerable to adversarial attacks, underscoring the urgent need for stronger defenses.TAMAS provides a foundation for systematically studying and improving the safety of multi-agent LLM systems.Code and dataset is available at https://github.com/microsoft/TAMAS.
Ishan Kavathekar, Hemang Jain, Ameya Rathod, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru, Tanuja Ganu
ACL (1)3