Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Seth R. Gorelik

dblp:423/7989 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-9186-1767ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics › visual encoding
colormap design
1.012026
Affective Color Scales for Colormap Data Visualizations · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2026
Visualization and visual analytics › visual encoding
color mapping
1.012026
Affective Color Scales for Colormap Data Visualizations · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2026
Visualization and visual analytics
visual encoding
1.012026
Affective Color Scales for Colormap Data Visualizations · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2026
Visualization and visual analytics › perception › visual perception
color perception
0.312026
Affective Color Scales for Colormap Data Visualizations · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2026
Visualization and visual analytics
perception
0.312026
Affective Color Scales for Colormap Data Visualizations · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Affective Color Scales for Colormap Data Visualizations
abstract
Research on affective visualization design has shown that color is an especially powerful feature for influencing the emotional connotation of visualizations. Associations between colors and emotions are largely driven by lightness (e.g., lighter colors are associated with positive emotions, whereas darker colors are associated with negative emotions). Designing visualizations to have all light or all dark colors to convey particular emotions may work well for visualizations in which colors represent categories and spatial channels encode data values. However, this approach poses a problem for visualizations that use color to represent spatial patterns in data (e.g., colormap data visualizations) because lightness contrast is needed to reveal fine details in spatial structure. In this study, we found it is possible to design colormaps that have strong lightness contrast to support spatial vision while communicating clear affective connotation. We also found that affective connotation depended not only on the color scales used to construct the colormaps, but also the frequency with which colors appeared in the map, as determined by the underlying dataset (data-dependence hypothesis). These results emphasize the importance of data-aware design, which accounts for not only the design features that encode data (e.g., colors, shapes, textures), but also how those design features are instantiated in a visualization, given the properties of the data.
Halle C. Braun, Kushin Mukherjee, Seth R. Gorelik, Karen B. Schloss
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.3