Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bertille Tierny

dblp:423/8186 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › fairness criteria
demographic parity
2.022026
Decomposing Direct and Indirect Biases in Linear Models Under Demographic Parity Constraint · AAAI 2026
Decomposing Direct and Indirect Biases in Linear Models Under Demographic Parity Constraint (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
2.022026
Decomposing Direct and Indirect Biases in Linear Models Under Demographic Parity Constraint · AAAI 2026
Decomposing Direct and Indirect Biases in Linear Models Under Demographic Parity Constraint (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
feature interpretation
1.012026
Decomposing Direct and Indirect Biases in Linear Models Under Demographic Parity Constraint · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
1.012026
Decomposing Direct and Indirect Biases in Linear Models Under Demographic Parity Constraint · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

post-processing · 2.0linear model coefficient analysis · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Decomposing Direct and Indirect Biases in Linear Models Under Demographic Parity Constraint (Student Abstract)
abstract
Linear models are widely used in high-stakes decision-making due to their interpretability, but fairness constraints like Demographic Parity (DP) create opaque effects on model coefficients and predictive bias distribution. We propose a post-processing framework that can be applied on top of any linear model to decompose bias into direct (sensitive-attribute) and indirect (correlated-features) components. Our method analytically characterizes how DP reshapes each coefficient, enabling transparent feature-level interpretation.
Bertille Tierny, Arthur Charpentier, François Hu
AAAI1
2026 Decomposing Direct and Indirect Biases in Linear Models Under Demographic Parity Constraint
abstract
Linear models are widely used in high-stakes decision-making due to their simplicity and interpretability. Yet when fairness constraints such as demographic parity are introduced, their effects on model coefficients, and thus on how predictive bias is distributed across features, remain opaque. Existing approaches on linear models often rely on strong and unrealistic assumptions, or overlook the explicit role of the sensitive attribute, limiting their practical utility for fairness assessment. We propose a post-processing framework that can be applied on top of any linear model to decompose the resulting bias into direct (sensitive-attribute) and indirect (correlated-features) components. Our method analytically characterizes how demographic parity reshapes each model coefficient, including those of both sensitive and non-sensitive features. This enables a transparent, feature-level interpretation of fairness interventions and reveals how bias may persist or shift through correlated variables. Our framework requires no model retraining and provides actionable insights for model auditing and mitigation. Experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that our method captures fairness dynamics missed by prior work, offering a practical and interpretable tool for responsible deployment of linear models.
Bertille Tierny, Arthur Charpentier, François Hu
AAAI1