Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zhongyang Qian
dblp:424/1236
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0009-4963-8279ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Services computing and microservices · 100% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Services computing and microservices
qos prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Hybrid Reputation Fusion and Mutual Information Maximization for Web Services QoS Prediction · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2025 |
Internet of things and sensor networks
iot services |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Hybrid Reputation Fusion and Mutual Information Maximization for Web Services QoS Prediction · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mutual information maximization · 1.7deep learning · 1.7attention mechanism · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hybrid Reputation Fusion and Mutual Information Maximization for Web Services QoS PredictionabstractIn the Internet of Things (IoT) environment, predicting the Quality of Service (QoS) is a challenging task due to the diversity of devices and service types. The dispersed nature of data collected from edge devices further complicates data sharing, thereby affecting the integrity and standardization of QoS evaluation. To address these issues, this paper proposes a QoS prediction model named HRMI, which efficiently integrates decentralized data and accommodates heterogeneous information to improve user experience. The HRMI framework comprises three main phases and one information-theoretic loss function: (1)Reputation Assessment, which leverages Utility Maximization theory and a Reputation Hybridization module to derive user and service reputations; (2)Feature Extraction, which employs deep learning techniques to construct user and service feature vectors from contextual attributes such as IDs, regions, and reputations; (3)Feature Interaction, which applies an attention mechanism to capture multi-scale feature dependencies and uncover deeper feature correlations; and (4)Mutual Information Loss, which exploits complementary information among feature vectors by maximizing the mutual information between feature representations and predicted values. Extensive experiments conducted on a widely used real-world dataset demonstrate that HRMI consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baseline methods. Yugen Du, Yunpeng Han, Zhongyang Qian |
IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. | 5 |