Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Adriel Sosa Marco
dblp:424/1664
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 50% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models
bayesian deep learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Uncertainty Quantification for Deep Regression using Contextualised Normalizing Flows · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian prediction
predictive distribution |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Uncertainty Quantification for Deep Regression using Contextualised Normalizing Flows · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
predictive uncertainty |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Uncertainty Quantification for Deep Regression using Contextualised Normalizing Flows · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Uncertainty Quantification for Deep Regression using Contextualised Normalizing Flows · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
normalizing flow · 0.9bayesian approximation · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Uncertainty Quantification for Deep Regression using Contextualised Normalizing FlowsabstractQuantifying uncertainty in deep regression models is important both for understanding the confidence of the model and for safe decision-making in high-risk domains. Existing approaches that yield prediction intervals overlook distributional information, neglecting the effect of multimodal or asymmetric distributions on decision-making. Similarly, full or approximated Bayesian methods, while yielding the predictive posterior density, demand major modifications to the model architecture and retraining. We introduce MCNF, a novel post hoc uncertainty quantification method that produces both prediction intervals and the full conditioned predictive distribution. MCNF operates on top of the underlying trained predictive model; thus, no predictive model retraining is needed. We provide experimental evidence that the MCNF-based uncertainty estimate is well calibrated, is competitive with state-of-the-art uncertainty quantification methods, and provides richer information for downstream decision-making tasks Adriel Sosa Marco, John Daniel Kirwan, Alexia Toumpa, Simos Gerasimou |
NeurIPS | 1 |