Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Timo Reim
dblp:424/4420
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0002-7307-1347ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein-protein interaction prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Deep learning models for unbiased sequence-based PPI prediction plateau at an accuracy of 0.65 · Bioinform. 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein-protein interaction prediction
sequence-based PPI prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Deep learning models for unbiased sequence-based PPI prediction plateau at an accuracy of 0.65 · Bioinform. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-attention · 0.9protein language model embeddings · 0.9cross-attention · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Deep learning models for unbiased sequence-based PPI prediction plateau at an accuracy of 0.65abstractMOTIVATION: As most proteins interact with other proteins to perform their respective functions, methods to computationally predict these interactions have been developed. However, flawed evaluation schemes and data leakage in test sets have obscured the fact that sequence-based protein-protein interaction (PPI) prediction is still an open problem. Recently, methods achieving better-than-random performance on leakage-reduced PPI data have been proposed. RESULTS: Here, we show that the use of ESM-2 protein embeddings explains this performance gain irrespective of model architecture. We compared the performance of models with varying complexity, per-protein, and per-token embeddings, as well as the influence of self- or cross-attention, where all models plateaued at an accuracy of 0.65. Moreover, we show that the tested sequence-based models cannot implicitly learn a contact map as an intermediate layer. These results imply that other input types, such as structure, might be necessary for producing reliable PPI predictions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All code for models and execution of the models is available at https://github.com/daisybio/PPI_prediction_study. Python version 3.8.18 and PyTorch version 2.1.1 were used for this study. The environment containing the versions of all other packages used can be found in the GitHub repository. The used data are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21591618.v3. Timo Reim, Anne Hartebrodt, David B. Blumenthal, Judith Bernett, Markus List |
Bioinform. | 1 |