Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrew Tinits

dblp:424/4597 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-7593-3356ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 67% Rendering · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing › image restoration
denoising
0.912025
Nonlinear Noise2Noise for Efficient Monte Carlo Denoiser Training · SIGGRAPH Asia 2025
Image and video processing › image restoration
image denoising
0.912025
Nonlinear Noise2Noise for Efficient Monte Carlo Denoiser Training · SIGGRAPH Asia 2025
Rendering
monte carlo rendering
0.912025
Nonlinear Noise2Noise for Efficient Monte Carlo Denoiser Training · SIGGRAPH Asia 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

nonlinear function analysis · 0.9noise2noise · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Nonlinear Noise2Noise for Efficient Monte Carlo Denoiser Training
abstract
The Noise2Noise method allows for training machine learning-based denoisers with pairs of input and target images where both the input and target can be noisy. This removes the need for training with clean target images, which can be difficult to obtain. However, Noise2Noise training has a major limitation: nonlinear functions applied to the noisy targets will skew the results. This bias occurs because the nonlinearity makes the expected value of the noisy targets different from the clean target image. Since nonlinear functions are common in image processing, avoiding them limits the types of preprocessing that can be performed on the noisy targets. Our main insight is that certain nonlinear functions can be applied to the noisy targets without adding significant bias to the results. We develop a theoretical framework for analyzing the effects of these nonlinearities, and describe a class of nonlinear functions with minimal bias.
Andrew Tinits, Stephen Mann
SIGGRAPH Asia1