Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kai Golan Hashiloni
dblp:424/5319
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0005-6731-1609ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Information extraction and text analysis · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › lexical semantics › multiword expression
idiom detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Easy as PIE? Identifying Multi-Word Expressions with LLMs · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › phrase extraction
multiword expression identification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Easy as PIE? Identifying Multi-Word Expressions with LLMs · EMNLP 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model prompting · 0.9few-shot prompting · 0.9chain-of-thought prompting · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Automatic Segmentation of Classical Tibetan Texts into Autochthonous and Allochthonous Regions
Guy Bilitski, Lev Shechter, Sonam Jamtsho, Nir Marciano, Nicola Bajetta, Rebecca Sundén, Omri Drori, Kai Golan Hashiloni, Orr Meir Zwebner, Asaf Shina, Orna Almogi, Dorji Wangchuk, Kfir Bar |
LREC | 8 |
| 2025 | Easy as PIE? Identifying Multi-Word Expressions with LLMsabstractWe investigate the identification of idiomatic expressions-a semantically noncompositional subclass of multiword expressions (MWEs)-in running text using large language models (LLMs) without any fine-tuning.Instead, we adopt a prompt-based approach and evaluate a range of prompting strategies, including zero-shot, few-shot, and chain-of-thought variants, across multiple languages, datasets, and model types.Our experiments show that, with well-crafted prompts, LLMs can perform competitively with supervised models trained on annotated data.These findings highlight the potential of prompt-based LLMs as a flexible and effective alternative for idiomatic expression identification. Kai Golan Hashiloni, Ofri Hefetz, Kfir Bar |
EMNLP | 1 |