Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kai Golan Hashiloni

dblp:424/5319 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0005-6731-1609ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › lexical semantics › multiword expression
idiom detection
0.912025
Easy as PIE? Identifying Multi-Word Expressions with LLMs · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › phrase extraction
multiword expression identification
0.912025
Easy as PIE? Identifying Multi-Word Expressions with LLMs · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model prompting · 0.9few-shot prompting · 0.9chain-of-thought prompting · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Automatic Segmentation of Classical Tibetan Texts into Autochthonous and Allochthonous Regions
Guy Bilitski, Lev Shechter, Sonam Jamtsho, Nir Marciano, Nicola Bajetta, Rebecca Sundén, Omri Drori, Kai Golan Hashiloni, Orr Meir Zwebner, Asaf Shina, Orna Almogi, Dorji Wangchuk, Kfir Bar
LREC8
2025 Easy as PIE? Identifying Multi-Word Expressions with LLMs
abstract
We investigate the identification of idiomatic expressions-a semantically noncompositional subclass of multiword expressions (MWEs)-in running text using large language models (LLMs) without any fine-tuning.Instead, we adopt a prompt-based approach and evaluate a range of prompting strategies, including zero-shot, few-shot, and chain-of-thought variants, across multiple languages, datasets, and model types.Our experiments show that, with well-crafted prompts, LLMs can perform competitively with supervised models trained on annotated data.These findings highlight the potential of prompt-based LLMs as a flexible and effective alternative for idiomatic expression identification.
Kai Golan Hashiloni, Ofri Hefetz, Kfir Bar
EMNLP1