VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Wu Mianzhi
dblp:424/6887
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Services computing and microservices · 77% Operating systems · 23% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
LLM agents |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Automating Complex Document Workflows via Stepwise and Rollback-Enabled Operation Orchestration · AAAI 2026 |
Services computing and microservices › workflow management
workflow automation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Automating Complex Document Workflows via Stepwise and Rollback-Enabled Operation Orchestration · AAAI 2026 |
Operating systems
fault tolerance |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Automating Complex Document Workflows via Stepwise and Rollback-Enabled Operation Orchestration · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stepwise planning · 2.0rollback · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Automating Complex Document Workflows via Stepwise and Rollback-Enabled Operation OrchestrationabstractWorkflow automation promises substantial productivity gains in everyday document-related tasks. While prior agentic systems can execute isolated instructions, they struggle with automating multi-step, session-level workflows due to limited control over the operational process. To this end, we introduce AutoDW, a novel execution framework that enables stepwise, rollback-enabled operation orchestration. AutoDW incrementally plans API actions conditioned on user instructions, intent-filtered API candidates, and the evolving states of the document. It further employs robust rollback mechanisms at both the argument and API levels, enabling dynamic correction and fault tolerance. These designs together ensure that the execution trajectory of AutoDW remains aligned with user intent and document context across long-horizon workflows. To assess its effectiveness, we construct a comprehensive benchmark of 250 sessions and 1,708 human-annotated instructions, reflecting realistic document processing scenarios with interdependent instructions. AutoDW achieves 90% and 62% completion rates on instruction- and session-level tasks, respectively, outperforming strong baselines by 40% and 76%. Moreover, AutoDW also remains robust for the decision of backbone LLMs and on tasks with varying difficulty. Hanhui Ye, Liao Xiang, Wu Mianzhi, Renjun Hu |
AAAI | 6 |