Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tommaso Amico
dblp:424/7564
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0000-4652-2793ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 67% Recommender systems · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining
anomaly detection |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | DCFO: Density-Based Counterfactuals for Outliers · KDD (1) 2026 |
Recommender systems › explainable recommendation
counterfactual explanation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | DCFO: Density-Based Counterfactuals for Outliers · KDD (1) 2026 |
Data mining › anomaly detection
outlier explanation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | DCFO: Density-Based Counterfactuals for Outliers · KDD (1) 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gradient-based optimization · 1.0counterfactual generation · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | DCFO: Density-Based Counterfactuals for OutliersabstractOutlier detection identifies data points that significantly deviate from the majority of the data distribution. Explaining outliers is crucial for understanding the underlying factors that contribute to their detection, validating their significance, and identifying potential biases or errors. Effective explanations provide actionable insights, facilitating preventive measures to avoid similar outliers in the future. Counterfactual explanations clarify why specific data points are classified as outliers by identifying minimal changes required to alter their prediction. Although valuable, most existing counterfactual explanation methods overlook the unique challenges posed by outlier detection, and fail to target classical, widely adopted outlier detection algorithms. Local Outlier Factor (LOF) is one of the most popular unsupervised outlier detection methods, quantifying outlierness through relative local density. Despite LOF's widespread use across diverse applications, it lacks interpretability. To address this limitation, we introduce Density-based Counterfactuals for Outliers (DCFO), a novel method specifically designed to generate counterfactual explanations for LOF. DCFO partitions the data space into regions where LOF behaves smoothly, enabling efficient gradient-based optimisation. Extensive experimental validation on 50 OpenML datasets demonstrates that DCFO consistently outperforms benchmarked competitors, offering superior proximity and validity of generated counterfactuals. Tommaso Amico, Pernille Matthews, Lena Krieger 0001, Arthur Zimek, Ira Assent |
KDD (1) | 1 |