Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tinglang Wu

dblp:424/8430 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Question answering and dialogue systems · 67% Language models and text generation · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › LLM agents
agentic search
1.012026
D²Plan: Dual-Agent Dynamic Global Planning for Complex Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › reasoning-based question answering
multi-hop question answering
1.012026
D²Plan: Dual-Agent Dynamic Global Planning for Complex Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
retrieval-augmented reasoning
1.012026
D²Plan: Dual-Agent Dynamic Global Planning for Complex Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning · ACL (1) 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

supervised fine-tuning · 1.0reinforcement learning · 1.0plan-oriented rewards · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 D²Plan: Dual-Agent Dynamic Global Planning for Complex Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning
abstract
Recent search-augmented LLMs trained with reinforcement learning (RL) can interleave searching and reasoning for multi-hop reasoning tasks.However, they face two critical failure modes as the accumulating context becomes flooded with both crucial evidence and irrelevant information: (1) ineffective search chain construction that produces incorrect queries or omits retrieval of critical information, and (2) reasoning hijacking by peripheral evidence that causes models to misidentify distractors as valid evidence.To address these challenges, we propose D 2 PLAN, a Dual-agent Dynamic global Planning paradigm for complex retrieval-augmented reasoning.D 2 PLAN operates through the collaboration of a Reasoner and a Purifier: the Reasoner constructs explicit global plans during reasoning and dynamically adapts them based on retrieval feedback; the Purifier assesses retrieval relevance and condenses key information for the Reasoner.We further introduce a two-stage training framework consisting of supervised finetuning (SFT) cold-start on synthesized trajectories and RL with plan-oriented rewards to teach LLMs to master the D 2 PLAN paradigm.Extensive experiments demonstrate that D 2 PLAN enables more coherent multi-step reasoning and stronger resilience to irrelevant information, thereby achieving superior performance on challenging QA benchmarks.
Kangcheng Luo, Tinglang Wu, Yansong Feng 0002
ACL (1)2