Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Guocheng Zhai

dblp:426/8137 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Vision and language · 87% Language models and text generation · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model › multimodal large language model
multimodal large language model reasoning
1.012026
AStar: Boosting Multimodal Reasoning with Automated Structured Thinking · AAAI 2026
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal reasoning
1.012026
AStar: Boosting Multimodal Reasoning with Automated Structured Thinking · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

thought cards · 1.0retrieval of reasoning patterns · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 AStar: Boosting Multimodal Reasoning with Automated Structured Thinking
abstract
Multimodal large language models excel across diverse domains but struggle with complex visual reasoning tasks. To enhance their reasoning capabilities, current approaches typically rely on explicit search or post-training techniques. However, search-based methods suffer from computational inefficiency due to extensive solution space exploration, while post-training methods demand substantial data, computational resources, and often exhibit training instability. To address these challenges, we propose **AStar**, a training-free, **A**utomatic **S**tructured **t**hinking paradigm for multimod**a**l **r**easoning. Specifically, we introduce novel "thought cards", a lightweight library of high-level reasoning patterns abstracted from prior samples. For each test problem, AStar adaptively retrieves the optimal thought cards and seamlessly integrates these external explicit guidelines with the model’s internal implicit reasoning capabilities. Compared to previous methods, AStar eliminates computationally expensive explicit search and avoids additional complex post-training processes, enabling a more efficient reasoning approach. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our framework achieves 53.9% accuracy on MathVerse (surpassing GPT-4o's 50.2%) and 32.7% on MathVision (outperforming GPT-4o's 30.4%). Further analysis reveals the remarkable transferability of our method: thought cards generated from mathematical reasoning can also be applied to other reasoning tasks, even benefiting general visual perception and understanding. AStar serves as a plug-and-play test-time inference method, compatible with other post-training techniques, providing an important complement to existing multimodal reasoning approaches.
Mingkuan Feng, Guocheng Zhai, Shuai Zhang 0014, Zheng Lian 0004, Fangrui Lv, Pengpeng Shao, Ruihan Jin, Zhengqi Wen, Jianhua Tao 0001
AAAI3