Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hyeseon An

dblp:427/1046 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 50% Reinforcement learning · 25% Language models and text generation · 25%
Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › abusive language detection
hate speech detection
1.012026
RV-HATE: Reinforced Multi-Module Voting for Implicit Hate Speech Detection · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › abusive language detection › hate speech detection
implicit hate speech detection
1.012026
RV-HATE: Reinforced Multi-Module Voting for Implicit Hate Speech Detection · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
watermarking
1.012026
A Linguistics-Aware LLM Watermarking via Syntactic Predictability · ACL (1) 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

part-of-speech n-gram modeling · 2.0in-context prompting · 2.0voting mechanism · 1.0reinforcement learning · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 RV-HATE: Reinforced Multi-Module Voting for Implicit Hate Speech Detection
abstract
Hate speech remains prevalent in human society and continues to evolve in its forms and expressions.Modern advancements in the internet and online anonymity accelerate its rapid spread and complicate its detection.However, hate speech datasets exhibit diverse characteristics primarily because they are constructed from different sources and platforms, each reflecting different linguistic styles and social contexts.Despite this diversity, prior studies on hate speech detection often rely on fixed methodologies without adapting to dataspecific features.We introduce RV-HATE, a detection framework designed to account for the dataset-specific characteristics of each hate speech dataset.RV-HATE consists of multiple specialized modules, where each module focuses on distinct linguistic or contextual features of hate speech.The framework employs reinforcement learning to optimize weights that determine the contribution of each module for a given dataset.A voting mechanism then aggregates the module outputs to produce the final decision.RV-HATE offers two primary advantages: (1) it improves detection accuracy by tailoring the detection process to dataset-specific attributes, and (2) it also provides interpretable insights into the distinctive features of each dataset.Consequently, our approach effectively addresses implicit hate speech and achieves superior performance compared to conventional static methods.Our code is available at https: //github.com/leeyejin1231/RV-HATE.
Hyeseon An, Yo-Sub Han
ACL (1)2
2026 A Linguistics-Aware LLM Watermarking via Syntactic Predictability
abstract
As large language models (LLMs) continue to advance rapidly, reliable governance tools have become critical.Publicly verifiable watermarking is particularly essential for fostering a trustworthy AI ecosystem.A central challenge persists: balancing text quality against detection robustness.Recent studies have sought to navigate this trade-off by leveraging signals from model output distributions (e.g., token-level entropy); however, their reliance on these modelspecific signals presents a significant barrier to public verification, as the detection process requires access to the logits of the underlying model.We introduce STELA, a novel framework that aligns watermark strength with the linguistic degrees of freedom inherent in language.STELA dynamically modulates the signal using part-of-speech (POS) n-gram-modeled linguistic indeterminacy, weakening it in grammatically constrained contexts to preserve quality and strengthening it in contexts with greater linguistic flexibility to enhance detectability.Our detector operates without access to any model logits, thus facilitating publicly verifiable detection.Through extensive experiments on typologically diverse languages-analytic English, isolating Chinese, and agglutinative Korean-we show that STELA surpasses prior methods in detection robustness.
Shinwoo Park, Hyeseon An, Yo-Sub Han
ACL (1)3