Weak memory models such as the Arm model are perceived as enabling higher performance than strong models such as TSO. We critically test this perception on Apple silicon CPUs, whose runtime-configurable TSO mode enables a direct comparison with native Arm mode. We find that Apple silicon TSO mode preserves Arm weak-memory optimizations, typically yielding execution times within 3% of Arm mode across modern applications and classic benchmarks. Although some applications experience higher TSO slowdowns, we trace these to artifacts of Apple's TSO implementation rather than inherent TSO ordering constraints. Our results challenge the perception that the Arm memory model offers a significant performance advantage over TSO in Apple silicon.