Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Uttam Rao
dblp:429/6562
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Knowledge graphs · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational social science and digital humanities
science of science |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | LLM-Enabled Scientific Knowledge Diffusion Analysis · AAAI 2026 |
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph construction |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | LLM-Enabled Scientific Knowledge Diffusion Analysis · AAAI 2026 |
Knowledge graphs › domain-specific knowledge graph
scientific knowledge graph |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | LLM-Enabled Scientific Knowledge Diffusion Analysis · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
timed automata · 2.0natural language to graph query · 2.0multi-agent LLM pipeline · 2.0entity disambiguation · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | LLM-Enabled Scientific Knowledge Diffusion AnalysisabstractBibliometric and science-of-science studies have yielded valuable insights into co-authorship and citation networks, yet most analyses rely on static datasets and limited relation types. We introduce a multi-agent AI architecture that orchestrates specialized large language model (LLM) agents (ingestion, extraction, disambiguation, integration, and analysis) to build and query a comprehensive knowledge graph. Ingestion agents unify data from diverse sources such as OpenAlex, ORCID, ROR, USPTO, and custom web scrapers. Extraction agents harness LLMs to parse unstructured text. Disambiguation agents combine rule-based heuristics with LLM reasoning to resolve ambiguous authors and institutions. Integration agents assemble and cache a provenance-rich graph. An analysis agent translates natural language questions into graph queries and interprets results. This end-to-end pipeline produces a rich graph schema spanning authors, institutions, publications, patents, grants, topics, and temporal relations. Researcher mobility and knowledge diffusion are then modeled as timed automata, where each researcher node’s institutional transitions and accumulated attributes (such as publications, collaborators, and topic expertise) enable dynamic temporal reasoning. Results show that our multi-agent, graph-based system consistently outperforms standalone LLMs and research agents on complex temporal queries, entity disambiguation accuracy, and cross-entity reasoning while maintaining competitive efficiency. These capabilities position the system as a foundation for real-time, LLM-assisted knowledge analysis platforms that can support science policy, research evaluation, and meta-scientific inquiry. Uttam Rao, Madhav V. Marathe |
AAAI | 1 |